OPVHHJV LLC v. Richard Cornelius

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 19, 2024·No. 24-10622·Unpublished

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 24-10622 Document: 9-1 Date Filed: 04/19/2024 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

No. 24-10622 Non-Argument Calendar

OPVHHJV LLC, d.b.a. Pathway Property Management, HPA II BORROWER 2021-1 LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellees, versus RICHARD CORNELIUS,

Defendant-Appellant,

ANY OTHER OCCUPANTS, USCA11 Case: 24-10622 Document: 9-1 Date Filed: 04/19/2024 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 24-10622

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:23-cv-06030-VMC

Before WILSON, NEWSOM, and GRANT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. The district court’s order remanding the action to Georgia state court is not reviewable on appeal because the district court based its remand on a lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), (d); New v. Sports & Recreation, 114 F.3d 1092, 1095-96 (11th Cir. 1997); Whole Health Chiropractic & Wellness, Inc. v. Humana Med. Plan, Inc., 254 F.3d 1317, 1319 (11th Cir. 2001). Further, the notice of removal did not cite 28 U.S.C. §§ 1442 or 1443 as a basis for removal. No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPVHHJV LLC v. Richard Cornelius, (11th Cir. 2024).

OPVHHJV LLC v. Richard Cornelius (OPVHHJV LLC v. Richard Cornelius) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New v. Sports & Recreation, Inc.
114 F.3d 1092 (Eleventh Circuit, 1997)