Opti Inc. v. via Technologies, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Opti Inc. v. via Technologies, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedFebruary 8, 2016

Docket13-1670

StatusUnpublished

This text of Opti Inc. v. via Technologies, Inc. (Opti Inc. v. via Technologies, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Opti Inc. v. via Technologies, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

OPTI INC., Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant

v.

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (TAIWAN), Defendants-Appellants ______________________

2013-1670, 2014-1839 ______________________

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 2:10-cv-00279-JRG, Judge J. Rodney Gilstrap. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

MICHAEL LOUIS BRODY, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chi- cago, IL, argued for plaintiff-cross-appellant. Also repre- sented by JAMES ETHAN MCCOMB; GEOFFREY P. EATON, Washington, DC.

BRIAN ANDREW CARPENTER, Beuther Joe & Carpenter LLC, Dallas, TX, argued for defendants-appellants. Also represented by ERIC WILLIAM BEUTHER; TIMOTHY J.H. CRADDOCK, Klemchuk LLP, Dallas, TX. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 8, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI