Opsincs v. State

831 So. 2d 1284, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 19029, 2002 WL 31828914
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 18, 2002·No. No. 4D01-5017·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm as to all issues raised. As to appellant’s second issue, we affirm based on Couzo v. State, 830 So.2d 177 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) and Miller v. State, 828 So.2d 445 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

AFFIRMED.

STONE, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opsincs v. State, 831 So. 2d 1284, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 19029, 2002 WL 31828914 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

831 So. 2d 1284 (Opsincs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schriefer v. Schriefer
831 So. 2d 1284 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)