O'Pry v. State

298 S.W. 596, 107 Tex. Crim. 661, 1927 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 551
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 3, 1927
DocketNo. 10974.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 298 S.W. 596 (O'Pry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Pry v. State, 298 S.W. 596, 107 Tex. Crim. 661, 1927 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 551 (Tex. 1927).

Opinions

LATTIMORE, Judge. —

Conviction of manslaughter, punishment two years in the penitentiary.

We find in the record no statement of facts. Appellant was charged with murder, and upon his trial was convicted as above stated. We find no exceptions to the charge of the court which presents error determinable by us in the absence of a statement of facts. There are a number of special charges, some of which were given and some refused because covered by the main charge and those special charges which were given. We perceive no error in the refusal of any of said charges. Appellant contends that this conviction can not stand because the offense of manslaughter has been repealed. The Act of the Fortieth Legislature repealing the offense of manslaughter has not yet become effective.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cadena v. State
6 S.W.2d 768 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Hernandez v. State
6 S.W.2d 748 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
298 S.W. 596, 107 Tex. Crim. 661, 1927 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opry-v-state-texcrimapp-1927.