O'Pry v. Noland Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

O'Pry v. Noland Co.

179 S.E. 630, 180 Ga. 565, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 479

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 11, 1935

DocketNo. 10547

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 179 S.E. 630 (O'Pry v. Noland Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'Pry v. Noland Co., 179 S.E. 630, 180 Ga. 565, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 479 (Ga. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Bell, Justice.

1. Under the evidence, direct and circumstantial, it can not be said as a matter of law that the auditor’s findings of fact were unauthorized.

2. A new trial was not required by the rulings of the auditor excluding testimony. Even if the evidence was admissible, it is apparent from the whole record that its rejection was harmless; and especially is this true since other testimony to the same general effect and from the same witness was admitted without objection.

3. The court did not err in disapproving the exceptions of fact and overruling the exceptions of law to the auditor’s report, or in rendering judgment in favor of the plaintiff and the intervenors.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concw, except Russell, O. J., who dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI