Opper v. United States

347 U.S. 1010, 74 S. Ct. 867, 98 L. Ed. 1134, 1954 U.S. LEXIS 1922
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Opper v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 348 U.S. 84
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 7, 1954·No. No. 719·Published

Opinion

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted limited to questions 3, 4, and 5 presented by the petition for the writ which read as follows:

“3. Whether, where an admission is made to law enforcement officers after the date of the acts charged as crimes, it is to be so far treated as a confession that, in the absence of corroboration, it is inadmissible.

John M. Kelley, Jr. and Frederick Bernays Wiener for petitioner. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Felicia Dubrovsky for the United States.

“4. Whether a conviction can be sustained where there is, apart from an admission made to law enforcement officers after the date of the acts charged as crimes, no proof of the corpus delicti.

“5. Whether, in convicting petitioner the jury, and in sustaining his conviction the court below, in fact admitted, as against him, statements of his co-defendant which, as a matter of law, were not competent evidence against him.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opper v. United States, 347 U.S. 1010, 74 S. Ct. 867, 98 L. Ed. 1134, 1954 U.S. LEXIS 1922 (1954).

347 U.S. 1010 (Opper v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.