Oppenheimer v. United States
66 F. 740, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 3340
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedFebruary 6, 1895
DocketNo. 789
StatusPublished
This text of 66 F. 740 (Oppenheimer v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Oppenheimer v. United States, 66 F. 740, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 3340 (circtsdny 1895).
Opinion
(orally). Chenille is a variety of cotton, a species of the genus cotton. Paragraph 351 is explicit in its provision. It refers to “all manufactures of chenille.” My impression is that this is a more specific designation than the general one of “cotton wearing apparel.” The decision of the board of general appraisers is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
66 F. 740, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 3340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oppenheimer-v-united-states-circtsdny-1895.