Oppenheimer v. . Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company
30 N.E. 66, 129 N.Y. 674, 1892 N.Y. LEXIS 935
This text of 30 N.E. 66 (Oppenheimer v. . Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Oppenheimer v. . Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company, 30 N.E. 66, 129 N.Y. 674, 1892 N.Y. LEXIS 935 (N.Y. 1892).
Opinion
Agree to affirm on the ground that the question is not sufficiently raised by exception; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People ex rel. Illinois Historic Preservation Agency v. Zych
687 N.E.2d 141 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1997)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
30 N.E. 66, 129 N.Y. 674, 1892 N.Y. LEXIS 935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oppenheimer-v-metropolitan-elevated-railway-company-ny-1892.