Oppenheimer v. City of Madeira, Ohio

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Doug Oppenheimer,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:19cv770

City of Madeira, Ohio,

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the Magistrate Judge on September 24, 2019 (Doc. 9). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s R&R (Doc. 9) have been filed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 9) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 5) is DENIED as MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court