Oppenheimer

197 Ct. Cl. 1064, 1972 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 45, 1972 WL 5145
United States Court of Claims·Decided February 4, 1972·No. No. 243-71·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Gif oili/m pay; dismissed; probationary employee. — Plaintiff, a veteran, sues to recover back pay from the time of his allegedly wrongful removal during his probationary period from his position as substitute mail carrier with the Post Office. This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiff’s motion for oral argument in Los An-geles, or in lieu thereof, further written argument. Upon consideration thereof, together with the opposition thereto and the briefs of the parties, without oral argument, the court concludes that the decision of the Board of Appeals and Review of the Civil Service Commission was not arbitrary or capricious and was supported by substantial evidence. On February 4, 1972, by order, the court denied plaintiff’s motions, granted defendant’s motion and dismissed the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oppenheimer, 197 Ct. Cl. 1064, 1972 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 45, 1972 WL 5145 (cc 1972).

197 Ct. Cl. 1064 (Oppenheimer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Biagioli v. United States
2 Cl. Ct. 304 (Court of Claims, 1983)