Oppenheim v. Thanasoulis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Oppenheim v. Thanasoulis

108 N.Y.S. 505

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 24, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 108 N.Y.S. 505 (Oppenheim v. Thanasoulis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oppenheim v. Thanasoulis, 108 N.Y.S. 505 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The injunction order appealed from must be reversed, because it grants the relief demanded in the complaint upon motion and prior to the trial of the action. It is not an injunction pendente lite, but by its terms is permanent. The court has no power to make such an order in advance of the trial.

The order appealed from is reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The injunction order appealed from must be reversed, because it grants the relief demanded in the complaint upon motion and prior to the trial of the action. It is not an injunction pendente lite, but by its terms is permanent. The court has no power to make such an order in advance of the trial.

The order appealed from is reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with $10 costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 N.Y.S. 505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oppenheim-v-thanasoulis-nyappdiv-1908.