Oppenheim v. Thanasoulis

123 A.D. 494, 108 N.Y.S. 505, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 95
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 24, 1908·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The injunction -order appealed from must be reversed, because it . grants the relief demanded in the complaint upon motion and prior to the tidal of the action. It is not an injunction pendente Ute\ but by its terms is permanent. The court has no power' to make such ail order in advance of the trial,

The-order appealed from is reversed, with ten dollars -costs and disbursements, and .the motion denied,' with ten dollars.-costs*.

Present —‘Pattebsox, P. j., Ingbaham, Claeke, Houghton and .Scott, JJ.

Order reversed, with ten dollars -costs and disbursements,- and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oppenheim v. Thanasoulis, 123 A.D. 494, 108 N.Y.S. 505, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 95 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

123 A.D. 494 (Oppenheim v. Thanasoulis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

R.C. v. City of New York
2024 NY Slip Op 03017 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Bronx Islamic Socy., Inc. v. Ally
2018 NY Slip Op 1276 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Graham v. Board of Supervisors
49 Misc. 2d 459 (New York Supreme Court, 1966)
People v. Allender Co.
181 Misc. 307 (New York Supreme Court, 1943)
Reynolds v. Webber
160 N.Y.S. 177 (New York Supreme Court, 1916)
Barzilay v. Loewenthal
134 A.D. 502 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)