Oppenheim v. Straus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Oppenheim v. Straus

210 A.D. 880

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1924·Published

Opinion

Orders modified by directing that the defendant Max Straus shall not be required to produce upon his examination any books or papers whatever, and by vacating the subpoena duces tecum heretofore issued herein, and as so modified affirmed, without costs, upon the ground that the production of books and papers must be compelled by order of the court. (See Ritzwoller v. Lurie, 204 App. Div. 768.) The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Merrell and McAvoy, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders modified by directing that the defendant Max Straus shall not be required to produce upon his examination any books or papers whatever, and by vacating the subpoena duces tecum heretofore issued herein, and as so modified affirmed, without costs, upon the ground that the production of books and papers must be compelled by order of the court. (See Ritzwoller v. Lurie, 204 App. Div. 768.) The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Merrell and McAvoy, JJ.

Oppenheim v. Straus, 210 A.D. 880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

210 A.D. 880 (Oppenheim v. Straus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related