Oppenheim v. Straus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Oppenheim v. Straus

210 A.D. 880

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1924

StatusPublished

This text of 210 A.D. 880 (Oppenheim v. Straus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oppenheim v. Straus, 210 A.D. 880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Orders modified by directing that the defendant Max Straus shall not be required to produce upon his examination any books or papers whatever, and by vacating the subpoena duces tecum heretofore issued herein, and as so modified affirmed, without costs, upon the ground that the production of books and papers must be compelled by order of the court. (See Ritzwoller v. Lurie, 204 App. Div. 768.) The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Merrell and McAvoy, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders modified by directing that the defendant Max Straus shall not be required to produce upon his examination any books or papers whatever, and by vacating the subpoena duces tecum heretofore issued herein, and as so modified affirmed, without costs, upon the ground that the production of books and papers must be compelled by order of the court. (See Ritzwoller v. Lurie, 204 App. Div. 768.) The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Merrell and McAvoy, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 A.D. 880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oppenheim-v-straus-nyappdiv-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack