Oppenheim v. Sefchik
283 A.D. 1028, 131 N.Y.S.2d 867, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6156
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 8, 1954
StatusPublished
This text of 283 A.D. 1028 (Oppenheim v. Sefchik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Oppenheim v. Sefchik, 283 A.D. 1028, 131 N.Y.S.2d 867, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6156 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. In affirming we do not pass upon the substantiality of the plaintiff’s claim. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Bastow and Botein, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
283 A.D. 1028, 131 N.Y.S.2d 867, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oppenheim-v-sefchik-nyappdiv-1954.