Oppenheim v. Oppenheim
114 A. 419, 91 N.J. Eq. 160, 6 Stock. 160, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 304
This text of 114 A. 419 (Oppenheim v. Oppenheim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Oppenheim v. Oppenheim, 114 A. 419, 91 N.J. Eq. 160, 6 Stock. 160, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 304 (N.J. 1919).
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevens.
For affirmance — Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, White, Heppeni-ieimer, Williams, T'aylor, Gardner, Ackerson — 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re Buchholz
224 B.R. 13 (D. New Jersey, 1998)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
114 A. 419, 91 N.J. Eq. 160, 6 Stock. 160, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oppenheim-v-oppenheim-nj-1919.