Oppenheim v. Oppenheim

114 A. 419, 91 N.J. Eq. 160, 6 Stock. 160, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 304
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 17, 1919·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevens.

For affirmance — Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, White, Heppeni-ieimer, Williams, T'aylor, Gardner, Ackerson — 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oppenheim v. Oppenheim, 114 A. 419, 91 N.J. Eq. 160, 6 Stock. 160, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 304 (N.J. 1919).

114 A. 419 (Oppenheim v. Oppenheim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Buchholz
224 B.R. 13 (D. New Jersey, 1998)