Oppenheim v. . Kridel

142 N.E. 317, 236 N.Y. 643, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1094

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Oppenheim v. . Kridel. Read the opinion of the Court — 236 N.Y. 156 →

New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 9, 1923·Published

Opinion

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 236 N. Y. 156.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oppenheim v. . Kridel, 142 N.E. 317, 236 N.Y. 643, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1094 (N.Y. 1923).

Pincite

142 N.E. 317 (Oppenheim v. . Kridel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

140 N.E. 227 (New York Court of Appeals, 1923)