Oppenheim & Macnow v. Worth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Oppenheim & Macnow v. Worth

109 A.D.2d 602, 486 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47090

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 5, 1985·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Arthur E. Blyn, J.), entered on or about March 6,1984, which denied defendant’s motion to vacate the default and assessed attorney’s fees in the sum of $2,000 to be paid personally by counsel for defendant, is modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of reducing the amount of the attorney’s fees to $1,000, and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

An examination of the record herein indicates that $1,000 in attorney’s fees to be paid personally by counsel for defendant is an appropriate assessment. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Ross, Carro and Milonas, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Arthur E. Blyn, J.), entered on or about March 6,1984, which denied defendant’s motion to vacate the default and assessed attorney’s fees in the sum of $2,000 to be paid personally by counsel for defendant, is modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of reducing the amount of the attorney’s fees to $1,000, and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

An examination of the record herein indicates that $1,000 in attorney’s fees to be paid personally by counsel for defendant is an appropriate assessment. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Ross, Carro and Milonas, JJ.

Oppenheim & Macnow v. Worth, 109 A.D.2d 602, 486 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47090 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

109 A.D.2d 602 (Oppenheim & Macnow v. Worth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related