Oppenheim & Macnow v. Worth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Oppenheim & Macnow v. Worth

109 A.D.2d 602, 486 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47090

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 5, 1985

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 109 A.D.2d 602 (Oppenheim & Macnow v. Worth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oppenheim & Macnow v. Worth, 109 A.D.2d 602, 486 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47090 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Arthur E. Blyn, J.), entered on or about March 6,1984, which denied defendant’s motion to vacate the default and assessed attorney’s fees in the sum of $2,000 to be paid personally by counsel for defendant, is modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of reducing the amount of the attorney’s fees to $1,000, and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

An examination of the record herein indicates that $1,000 in attorney’s fees to be paid personally by counsel for defendant is an appropriate assessment. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Ross, Carro and Milonas, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Arthur E. Blyn, J.), entered on or about March 6,1984, which denied defendant’s motion to vacate the default and assessed attorney’s fees in the sum of $2,000 to be paid personally by counsel for defendant, is modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of reducing the amount of the attorney’s fees to $1,000, and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

An examination of the record herein indicates that $1,000 in attorney’s fees to be paid personally by counsel for defendant is an appropriate assessment. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Ross, Carro and Milonas, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 A.D.2d 602, 486 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47090, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oppenheim-macnow-v-worth-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack