Opotowsky v. Henderson

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Opotowsky v. Henderson

7 Pelt. 275

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedFebruary 19, 1923

DocketNo.8880

StatusPublished

This text of 7 Pelt. 275 (Opotowsky v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Opotowsky v. Henderson, 7 Pelt. 275 (La. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

[276]*276Opotowsky and Sons vs Jno W.Henderson,Appellant.

No.8880

Charles F.Claiborne,Judge.

Plaintiff claims $152.15 balanoe due for goods sold and delivered.

Defendant failing to appear,there was judgment against him by default for1the amount claimed,with five per cent interest. The defendant has taken a suspensive appeal.

The plaintiff and appellee answered the appeal and prayed for ten per cent damages for frivolous appeal.C.P.907-890

No error in the judgment has been pointed out on Appeal and it appears to be frivolous and to have been taken for delay only.

In such cases,damages will be allowed. 1 H.D.101-1 L.D. 55-1 Taylor D.67-1 B.D. 52 -14 La 347- 16 La 565-569-17 A 77 30 A 400 -.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment herein be affirmed with ten per cent damages for a frivolous appeal.

Judgment affirmed with damages for frivolous appeal.

February 19th 1923.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI