Opinion on Motion for Judgment on Supersedeas Bond

158 P. 893, 57 Okla. 396
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedApril 25, 1916
StatusPublished

This text of 158 P. 893 (Opinion on Motion for Judgment on Supersedeas Bond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opinion on Motion for Judgment on Supersedeas Bond, 158 P. 893, 57 Okla. 396 (Okla. 1916).

Opinion

The plaintiff, Salmon C. Aldred, obtained a judgment in the lower court against the defendant, Geo. M. Werline, for the sum of $2,377.75, with interest at 6 per cent. from the 29th day of January, 1914. This proceeding in error was commenced to review said judgment and a supersedeas bond was executed, approved, and filed by Geo. M. Werline, as principal, and Chas. Nelson, D.P. Cotter, and E.L. Thompson, as sureties, and execution on said judgment stayed. The case was affirmed by this court heretofore, and a motion has been made for judgment against the sureties on the supersedeas bond. Under authority of Long v.Lang Co., 49 Okla. 342, 152 P. 1078; Starr v. Haygood,53 Okla. 358, 156 P. 1171; Oklahoma Fire Insurance Company v.Kimpel, post, p. 398, 151 P. 317, and Brown v. Davis, post, p. ___, 157 P. 925, the motion must be sustained.

Judgment is therefore entered in this court against Chas. Nelson, D.P. Cotter, and E.L. Thompson, for the sum of $2,377.75, with interest at 6 per cent. from January 29, 1914, until paid, and for the costs of the suit, for which execution may issue out of the trial court.

By the Court: It is so ordered. *Page 398

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Starr v. Haygood
1916 OK 436 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)
Long v. O. R. Lang & Co.
1915 OK 886 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)
Brown v. Davis
1916 OK 570 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 P. 893, 57 Okla. 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-on-motion-for-judgment-on-supersedeas-bond-okla-1916.