Opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court

578 A.2d 183, 1990 Me. LEXIS 333
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedAugust 2, 1990
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 578 A.2d 183 (Opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court, 578 A.2d 183, 1990 Me. LEXIS 333 (Me. 1990).

Opinion

COMMUNICATION FROM GOVERNOR PROPOUNDING QUESTION

To the Honorable Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court:

Believing that the pending demand (Attachment # 1) to issue a proclamation under 21-A MRSA §§ 371(2) and 362 (Supp. 1989) for two candidates for nomination to the November 4, 1990 general election for the State of Maine House of Representatives, who failed in the primary election of June 12, 1990 to receive the minimal number of votes required by 21-A MRSA § 723(1), raises an important question of law upon a solemn occasion within the meaning of Article VI, Section 3 of the Constitution of Maine,

I, John R. McKernan, Jr., Governor of the State of Maine, pursuant to the authority conferred upon me by Article VI, Section 3 of the Constitution of Maine, respectfully request the opinion of the honorable Jus[184]*184tices of the Supreme Judicial Court upon the question of law presented herein.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

On or before the statutory deadline, John Lisnik, House of Representatives District 143, and Julieo Perreault, House of Representatives District 150, filed petitions with the Office of the Secretary of State as candidates for nomination in the State of Maine House of Representatives’ primary election of June 12,1990. The Secretary of State, pursuant to 21-A MRSA § 337(1), accepted these petitions and deemed the candidates qualified for nomination under 21-A MRSA §§ 334, 335 and 336.

In order for a candidate for nomination by petition to become a nominee, the candidate must receive a plurality of the votes cast and a vote total equal to or in excess of the minimum number of signatures— twenty-five — needed to place a candidate’s name on the primary ballot. 21-A MRSA §§ 723(1), 335(5)(G). At the primary election in June, both of the above-named candidates failed to receive the requisite twenty-five votes. Attachment # 2.

On July 2, 1990, the Office of the Attorney General advised the Office of the Secretary of State that the failure of each candidate to receive the minimal vote total under 21-A MRSA § 723(1) constituted a vacancy within the meaning of 21-A MRSA §§ 371(2) and 362. Attachment # 3. Consequently, the Attorney General advised that the Governor should issue a proclamation for each of the districts, directing the appropriate political committee to meet and fill each “vacancy” by choosing a nominee for the general election. Id. Pursuant to 21-A MRSA § 371(2), the Secretary of State has called upon the Governor to issue these proclamations as soon as practicable to enable the appropriate political committees to meet, if at all, and to enable the Secretary of State to prepare the ballots for the general election in November. Attachment # 1. The Secretary of State construes 21-A MRSA § 374-A(2) to require the political committees to report to the Secretary of State by the third Monday in August that these “vacancies” have been filled. Id

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
578 A.2d 183, 1990 Me. LEXIS 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-of-the-justices-of-the-supreme-judicial-court-me-1990.