Opinion No.

Texas Attorney General Reports·Decided June 10, 1998·Published

Opinion

Mr. Delmar L. Cain General Counsel The Texas AM University System 301 Tarrow, 6th Floor College Station, Texas 77843-1230

Re: Whether recently enacted Government Code section 551.126, an Open Meetings Act provision authorizing governmental bodies to hold meetings by videoconference call, applies to a governing board of an institution of higher education, and related questions (RQ-1040)

On behalf of the board of regents of The Texas AM University System, you ask about the relationship between two sections of the Open Meetings Act — Government Code section 551.126,1 a recently enacted provision authorizing governmental bodies to hold meetings by videoconference call, and Government Code section 551.121, a ten-year-old provision authorizing a governing board of an institution of higher education to hold a meeting by telephone conference call in certain situations. You suggest that section 551.126 does not apply to any meeting of a governing board of an institution of higher education and that any meeting of a governing body of an institution of higher education conducted by videoconference call is governed only by section 551.121. We conclude that both sections apply to a governing body of an institution of higher education.

Chapter 551 of the Government Code, the codification of the Open Meetings Act, subchapter F, contains several provisions permitting meetings by teleconference and videoconference. Section 551.121, which was enacted in 1987,2 authorizes the governing board of an institution of higher education to conduct a meeting by telephone conference call under certain conditions. It provides in pertinent part as follows:

(b) This chapter does not prohibit the governing board of an institution of higher education from holding an open or closed meeting by telephone conference call.

(c) A meeting held by telephone conference call may be held only if:

(1) the meeting is a special called meeting and immediate action is required; and

(2) the convening at one location of a quorum of the governing board is difficult or impossible.

(d) The telephone conference call meeting is subject to the notice requirements applicable to other meetings.

(e) The notice of the telephone conference call meeting must specify as the location of the meeting the location where meetings of the governing board are usually held. For a meeting of the governing board of a university system, the notice must specify as the location of the meeting the board's conference room at the university system office.

(f) Each part of the telephone conference call meeting that is required to be open to the public shall be audible to the public at the location specified in the notice of the meeting as the location of the meeting and shall be tape recorded. The tape recording shall be made available to the public.

Gov't Code § 551.121.

Recently enacted section 551.126, which authorizes videoconference call meetings, applies to governmental bodies generally, providing in pertinent part:

(a) Except as otherwise provided by this section, this chapter does not prohibit a governmental body from holding an open or closed meeting by videoconference call.

(b) A meeting may be held by videoconference call only if a quorum of the governmental body is physically present at one location of the meeting.

(c) A meeting held by videoconference call is subject to the notice requirements applicable to other meetings in addition to the notice requirements prescribed by this section.

(d) The notice of the meeting to be held by videoconference call must specify as a location of the meeting the location where a quorum of the governmental body will be physically present and specify the intent to have a quorum present at that location. In addition, the notice of the meeting must specify as a location of the meeting each other location where a member of the governmental body who will participate in the meeting will be physically present during the meeting. Each of the locations shall be open to the public during the open portions of the meeting.

(e) Each portion of a meeting held by videoconference call that is required to be open to the public shall be visible and audible to the public at each location specified under Subsection (d).

(f) The governmental body shall make at least an audio recording of the meeting. The recording shall be made available to the public.

(g) Each location specified under Subsection (d) shall have two-way communication with each other location during the entire meeting. Each participant in the videoconference call, while speaking, shall be clearly visible and audible to each other participant and, during the open portion of the meeting, to the members of the public in attendance at the location of the meeting.

Id. § 551.126. Subsections (h) and (i) govern the quality of audio and video signals. Subsection (j) permits a governmental body to allow a member of the public to testify at a meeting from a remote location by videoconference call, without regard to whether a member of the governmental body is participating from a remote location.

To summarize the pertinent highlights of these provisions, section 551.121 authorizes the governing board of an institution of higher education to hold a meeting by telephone conference call only if the meeting is a special called meeting regarding a matter requiring immediate action and it is difficult or impossible to convene a quorum of the governing board in one location. The open portions of the telephone conference call meeting must be audible to the public at the location the governing board usually meets. Section 551.121 contemplates that a quorum of the governing board is not present in one location. Section 551.126, on the other hand, authorizes any governmental body to hold any meeting, not just a special called meeting, by videoconference call if a quorum of the governmental body is present at one location. Any open portion of the meeting must be open to the public, not only at the location of the quorum, but also at every remote location from which a member participates. There must be two-way video communication between all locations.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion No., (Tex. 1998).

Opinion No. (Opinion No.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.