Opinion No.

Texas Attorney General Reports·Decided March 3, 1995·Published

Opinion

Honorable John B. Holmes, Jr. Harris County District Attorney 201 Fannin, Suite 200 Houston, Texas 77002-1901

Re: Whether private security guards and off-duty peace officers are prohibited from carrying firearms on the premises of racetracks by section46.03 of the Penal Code (RQ-699)

Dear Mr. Holmes:

You ask whether an off-duty peace officer is prohibited from carrying a firearm on the premises of a racetrack. Your specific query is as follows:

May a peace officer, not working at the time for a governmental entity, but employed in an off-duty status or "extra-job" capacity for the purposes of providing security to his off-duty employer, a racetrack, go [onto] the premises of a racetrack with a firearm?

You also ask whether private security guards are prohibited from carrying firearms on the premises of racetracks. Since this office received your request, the revised Penal Code has gone into effect. See Act of May 29, 1993, 73d Leg., R.S., ch. 900, § 1.01, 1993 Tex. Sess. Law Serv. 3589, 3690-91. The provision that you asked about, former Penal Code section 46.04, has been amended and renumbered as section 46.03. See id. Other provisions relevant to your query have also been amended and renumbered.

Subsection (a) of section 46.02 of the Penal Code generally prohibits the carrying of a handgun. Subsection (b) of section 46.02 provides that

[i]t is a defense to prosecution under this section that the actor was, at the time of the commission of the offense . . .

(5) a person who holds a security officer commission issued by the Texas Board of Private Investigators and Private Security Agencies, if:

(A) he is engaged in the performance of his duties as a security officer or traveling to and from his place of assignment;

(B) he is wearing a distinctive uniform; and

(C) the weapon is in plain view; or

(6) a peace officer1, other than a person commissioned by the Texas State Board of Pharmacy.

See Penal Code § 46.02(b) (footnote added).2

Section 46.03 of the Penal Code, the particular statute about which you inquire, provides as follows:

(a) A person commits an offense if, with a firearm . . . he intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly goes:

(1) on the physical premises of a school, an educational institution, or a passenger transportation vehicle of a school or an educational institution, whether the school or educational institution is public or private, unless pursuant to written regulations or written authorization of the institution;

(2) on the premises of a polling place on the day of an election or while early voting is in progress;

(3) in any government court or offices utilized by the court, unless pursuant to written regulations or written authorization of the court;

(4) on the premises of a racetrack; or

(5) into a secured area of an airport.

(b) It is a defense to prosecution under Subsections (a)(1)-(4) that the actor possessed a firearm while in the actual discharge of his official duties as a peace officer . . . .

(f) An offense under this section is a third degree felony. [Emphases added.]

This section permits peace officers to carry firearms on the premises of racetracks while in the actual discharge of their official duties. Investigators employed by the Texas Racing Commission are clearly peace officers under this provision. See note 1 supra. You are concerned, however, that this provision precludes private security guards and off-duty peace officers from carrying firearms on the premises of racetracks.

The legislature added subsection (a)(4) regarding racetrack premises to former section 46.04, now renumbered as section 46.03, in 1989. See Act of May 27, 1989, 71st Leg., R.S., ch. 749, § 2, 1989 Tex. Gen. Laws 3332. In 1991, the legislature amended subsection (b) of former section 46.04 to provide that the defense afforded to peace officers while in the discharge of their actual duties applied to subsection (a)(4). See Act of May 18, 1991, 72d Leg., R.S., ch. 386, § 71, 1991 Tex. Sess. Law Serv. 1444, 1467; Act of May 18, 1991, 72d Leg., R.S., ch. 433, § 1, 1991 Tex. Sess. Law Serv. 1597. Based on the insertion of racetracks into former section 46.04 and a review of the legislative history and prior cases, you conclude that peace officers, while working at the time for a governmental entity, but employed in an off-duty status or "extra-job" capacity for the purposes of providing security to his off-duty employer, a racetrack, may not go [onto] the premises of a racetrack with a firearm.

You also conclude that private security guards are prohibited from carrying firearms on the premises of racetracks.

We agree with your conclusion. First, we believe it is mandated by the statutory language. Subsection (b) of section 46.03 provides a defense for peace officers only while in the discharge of their official duties. To conclude that peace officers are excepted from section 46.03 when they are off-duty would be contrary to the unambiguous language of subsection (b). In addition, section 46.03 simply does not provide a defense for private security guards, and thus clearly prohibits private security guards from carrying firearms on the premises of a racetrack under any circumstances. Furthermore, to graft the exception for private security guards and peace officers in section 46.02(b) onto section 46.03 would clearly run counter to the legislature's intent to treat the places listed in section 46.03 differently than all other places. Moreover, section 46.02(b) on its face operates to enumerate exceptions only to section 46.02(a).

In Attorney General Opinion JM-613, this office considered the relationship between the exception for peace officers to the general misdemeanor offense for carrying firearms set forth in former section 46.03, now section 46.02(b), and the defense for peace officers to the felony offense for carrying firearms in schools, polling places, and courts set forth in former section 46.04, now section 46.03. See Attorney General Opinion JM-613 (1986) at 5. It stated as follows: "If the legislature [in enacting former section 46.03] had intended peace officers to be protected from prosecution in other situations only when in the actual discharge of official duty, we believe it would have specified the circumstances, as it did in [former] section 46.04." Id. Attorney General JM-613 further supports our conclusion that the defense to former section 46.04, now section 46.03, for peace officers in the discharge of their official duties is much more limited than the general exception for peace officers provided by former subsection (a)(6) of section 46.03, now section 46.02(b)(6).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion No., (Tex. 1995).

Opinion No. (Opinion No.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bohn v. State
651 S.W.2d 274 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1983)