Opinion No.

Texas Attorney General Reports·Decided January 27, 1978·Published

Opinion

Honorable Gibson D. Lewis Chairman Natural Resources Commission House of Representatives Capitol Station 2910 Austin, Texas 78767

Honorable Hal H. Hood Commissioner Firemen's Pension Commission 503-F Sam Houston State Office Bldg. Austin, Texas 78701

Honorable Joe Resweber Harris County Attorney Houston, Texas 77002

Re: Retirement programs for volunteer firemen.

Gentlemen:

You have requested our opinion regarding a number of provisions of Senate Bill 411, Acts 1977, 65th Leg., ch. 269, at 710, codified as article 6243e.-3, V.T.C.S., which creates a Fire Fighters Relief and Retirement Fund to provide benefits for volunteer firemen. Section 2 of the statute provides in pertinent part:

(b) Participation in the fund is optional. Any governing body may, not later than 60 days after the effective date of this Act and in accordance with the usual procedures prescribed for other official actions of the governing body, elect to exempt itself from the requirements of this Act. Any action to provide for an exemption from the requirements of this Act may be rescind by the governing body at any time.

(c) Every governing body shall contribute for each fire fighter at least $12 for each month of qualified service beginning on the date the fire fighter enters the pension system. Contributions must be paid at least every six months. If the member fire department is situated in more than one political subdivision, the governing bodies of such political subdivisions shall contribute equally towards a total of at least $12 for each fire fighter for each month of qualified service.

`Governing body' is defined as

the governing body of any political subdivision of the state within which a rural fire prevention district created pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 57, Acts of the 55th Legislature, Regular Session, 1957 (Article 2351a-6, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes), is situated or the governing body of any city or town within which a fire department subject to the provisions of this Act is situated.

Sec. 1(13). `Qualified service' is defined as

fire-fighting service rendered without monetary remuneration while a member in good standing of a fire-fighting unit that has no fewer than 10 active members, and a minimum of two drills each month, each drill two hours long, and each active member present at 60 percent of the drills and 25 percent of the fires, or fire-fighting service rendered without monetary remuneration while a member of a fire-fighting unit which includes paid fire fighters. Absence caused by military duty does not affect qualified service.

Sec. 1(1).

You first ask whether a city which elects to exempt itself from the operation of Senate Bill 411 is required to create a retirement system for its volunteer firemen under article 6243e, V.T.C.S. The latter statute authorizes every incorporated city with a regularly organized active fire department to establish a firemen's retirement fund. You state that retirement funds have been created for a number of volunteer fire departments under article 6243e, wherein members contribute three to five dollars per year.

Section 15(a) of Senate Bill 411 requires that

[e]very fire fighter in the state who serves without monetary remuneration be a member of a solvent pension plan.

In our opinion, this provision is to be construed as subordinate to section 2(b), which permits governing body to `exempt itself from the requirements of this Act.' If a city so elects, we believe our courts would hold that the exemption is applicable to the entire statute, including section 15(a). In our opinion, therefore, a city which votes to exempt itself from the operation of Senate Bill 411 is not required by section 15(a) thereof to create a retirement system for its volunteer firemen under article 6243e.

You next ask whether members of a volunteer fire department which fails to conduct two two-hour drills per month, or members who fail to attend 60 percent of the drills and 25 percent of the fires, qualify for membership in the Fund. The definition of `qualified service' authorizes a city to make contributions only for service performed in accordance with the above-listed standards. A city is not exempt from the provisions of Senate Bill 411, however, merely because its volunteer fire department does not presently meet the criteria required for `qualified service,' since the conditions therefor might occur at any time. Such a city, unless it elected to exempt itself under section 2(b), must make contributions during any month in which any volunteer firemen render `qualified service' in accordance with the statute.

Your next question is whether the definition of `qualified service' is applicable to any department having ten or more active members, without regard to whether any members receive compensation. A nonpaid fire fighter renders `qualified service' in one of two ways: he is a member of a unit which contains paid fire fighters; or alternatively, he is a member of an all-volunteer unit and the volunteer unit meets certain standards. If any member of the unit is paid, the requirements attached to the all-volunteer unit are not applicable.

You also ask what constitutes `monetary remuneration' for purposes of the definition of `qualified service.' `Monetary' has been defined as

of or relating to money or to the instrumentalities and organizations by which money is supplied to the economy.

Webster's Third New International Dictionary 1457, 1458 (3d ed. 1967). `Money' generally refers to

the legal tender, metallic coins or legal tender currency of the United States.

Thompson v. State, 34 S.W. 629, 630 (Tex.Crim. 1896). See Rodgers v. State, 448 S.W.2d 465, 468 (Tex.Crim. 1969). `Money' is equivalent to `cash,' and as a rule, it includes checks as well as coin and currency. Baker and Taylor Drilling Co. v. Blanchard Drilling Co., 363 S.W.2d 818, 820 (Tex.Civ.App.-Amarillo 1962, no writ). It does not, however, refer to `any other character of property, real or personal.' Foy v. Clemmons,365 S.W.2d 384, 386 (Tex.Civ.App.-Dallas 1963, writ ref'd n.r.e.). In our opinion, therefore, `monetary remuneration' includes payment by coin, currency, check or money order, but does not comprehend the furnishing of free water to volunteer firemen by the municipal water system or the furnishing of water at special rates.

Your next series of questions relate to the meaning of `governing body.' The Act defines governing body in two ways: (1) the governing body of any political subdivision within which a rural fire prevention district is located or (2) the governing body of any city or town within which a volunteer fire department is located. A variety of political subdivisions may come within the first part of this definition. If a rural fire prevention district is located within a county, for example, the county is the political subdivision to make contributions. The county may not be the only political subdivision included within the terms of the statute, however.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion No., (Tex. 1978).

Opinion No. (Opinion No.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Golconda Lead Mines v. Neill
350 P.2d 221 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1960)
Rains v. County of Contra Costa
231 P.2d 55 (California Supreme Court, 1951)
Dreiling v. Home State Life Insurance
515 P.2d 757 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1973)
Barrington v. Cokinos
338 S.W.2d 133 (Texas Supreme Court, 1960)
Baker & Taylor Drilling Co. v. Blanchard Drilling Co.
363 S.W.2d 818 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1962)
Rodgers v. State
448 S.W.2d 465 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)
Foy v. Clemmons
365 S.W.2d 384 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1963)
King v. Oakley
434 P.2d 868 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1967)
City of Owensboro v. Board of Trustees, Etc.
190 S.W.2d 1005 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1945)
Adams v. Loftin
1 S.W.2d 429 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1927)
Lewis v. Independent Sch. Dist. of Austin
161 S.W.2d 450 (Texas Supreme Court, 1942)
Thompson v. State
34 S.W. 629 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1896)
Galveston, H. & H. R. Co. v. Anderson
229 S.W. 998 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1920)
Portland Traction Co. v. Hill
352 P.2d 552 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1960)