Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports·Decided November 16, 1953·Published

Opinion

OPINION — AG — ** TAPE RECORDING DEVICES — TAPE RECORDING MACHINES — RECORDING EQUIPMENT ** CLAIMS FOR SOUND RECORDING OR SOUND RE PRODUCING MACHINES, OR FOR SUPPLIES OR REPAIRS FOR SUCH MACHINES, FOR THE USE OF THE COUNTY COURT STENOGRAPHER OR COURT REPORTER REFERRED TO IN 20 O.S. 316 [20-316] THRU 20 O.S. 318 [20-318], MAY 'NOT' LEGALLY BE PAID FROM THE COURT FUND PROVIDED FOR IN 62 O.S. 321 [62-321] CITE: OPINION NO. JULY 19, 1952 — MORRIS, JULY 9, 1953 — BURGER, 62 O.S. 323 [62-323] (COURT FUND ONLY SUCH EXPENSES LAWFULLY INCURRED FOR POSITION OPERATION) (RICHARD M. HUFF)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion No., (Okla. Super. Ct. 1953).

Opinion No. (Opinion No.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mad River & Lake Erie Railroad v. Fulton
20 Ohio St. 318 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1851)