Home/Oklahoma Attorney General Reports/Opinion No.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports·Decided April 21, 1953·Published

Opinion

OPINION — AG — ** DUE PROCESS — REPRESENTED BY LAWYER DURING A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING ** THE AG BELIEVES THAT IT WOULD BE THE DUTY OF THE TRIAL COURT WHETHER OR NOT AN APPROPRIATION HAD BEEN MADE TO PAY THE ATTORNEY WHO IS ASSIGNED TO REPRESENT SUCH A DEFENDANT. HOWEVER, IN CONSIDERING A CLAIM FOR COMPENSATION MADE BY SUCH ATTORNEY, ATTENTION IS INVITED TO 22 O.S. 1271 [22-1271] (EMPLOYE COUNSEL, INDIGENT, PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION) CITE: 22 O.S. 464 [22-464], ARTICLE II, SECTION 20, 22 O.S. 251 [22-251], 22 O.S. 252 [22-252] (JAMES P. GARRETT)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion No., (Okla. Super. Ct. 1953).

Opinion No. (Opinion No.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.