Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports·Decided May 10, 1952·Published

Opinion

OPINION — AG — ** NEPOTISM — SCHOOL BOARD ** QUESTION: IS IT A VIOLATION OF THE LAW FOR A SCHOOL BOARD MEMBER'S MOTHER TO WORK AS A COOK ON THE HOT LUNCH PROGRAM IF THE SCHOOL BOARD DOES 'NOT' PAY HER SALARY, EXPENSES, ETC. BUT ALL FINANCIAL OBLIGATION OF HER SALARY OR WAGES ARE PAID BY THE COLLECTION OF MONEY FROM CHILDREN WHO EAT ON WHAT IS KNOWN AS THE ' HOT LUNCH PROGRAM '? — NEGATIVE (REIMBURSEMENT, FEDERAL FUNDS, SCHOOL DISTRICT, BOARD OF EDUCATION) CITE: 21 O.S. 481 [21-481], 70 O.S. 2A-4 [70-2A-4], 70 O.S. 2-4 [70-2-4] OPINION NO. APRIL 21, 1948 — HODGE (J. H. JOHNSON)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion No., (Okla. Super. Ct. 1952).

Opinion No. (Opinion No.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.