Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports·Decided June 20, 1951·Published

Opinion

OPINION — AG — ** STOCK DISTRICT — HERD LAW — CATTLE ** (1) 4 O.S. 94 [4-94] DOES 'NOT' EXEMPT ATOKA COUNTY FROM THE ENTIRE HERD LAW. (2) THE STOCK DISTRICTS AS HERETOFORE CREATED AND ESTABLISHED IN ATOKA COUNTY DO HAVE LEGAL EXISTENCE, PROVIDED THAT SAID STOCK DISTRICTS WERE CREATED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LAW, OR PROVIDED THAT SAID STOCK DISTRICTS EXIST AS DE FACTO STOCK DISTRICTS UNDER THE RULES LAID DOWN BY THE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF ' COWLEY V. WILKINS, 174 P.2d 257 (DOMESTIC ANIMALS, LIVESTOCK, APPLICATION OF LAW, OPEN RANGE) CITE: 4 O.S. 94 [4-94] (JAMES P. GARRETT)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion No., (Okla. Super. Ct. 1951).

Opinion No. (Opinion No.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cowley v. Wilkins
1946 OK 306 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1946)