Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports·Decided August 22, 1950·Published

Opinion

OPINION — AG — ** SUPERIOR COURT — EXISTENCE — COUNTY — JUDGES ** INASMUCH AN APPROPRIATION HAVE NOT BEEN MADE BY THE LEGISLATURE TO PAY THE ANNUAL SALARIES OF THE JUDGE AND COURT REPORTER OF THE COURT REFERRED (LAWTON), SUCH SALARIES CANNOT BE PAID (OTHER THAN THE AMOUNT PAYABLE TO THE REPORTER FROM THE COURT FUND OF THE COUNTY) UNLESS AND UNTIL AN APPROPRIATION IS MADE TO PAY THE SAME (SEE: 'ROUNDTREE V. STATE' 197 P.2d 973) THAT IS, UNLESS THE GOVERNOR AUTHORIZES THE PAYMENT THEREOF FROM THE " GOVERNOR'S CONTINGENCY AND EMERGENCY FUND " (POPULATION, CENSUS FIGURES) CITE: 20 O.S. 109 [20-109], 20 O.S. 141.1 [20-141.1], 20 O.S. 161 [20-161] (FRED HANSEN)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion No., (Okla. Super. Ct. 1950).

Opinion No. (Opinion No.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rountree v. Phelps
1948 OK 152 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1948)
Wilson v. Leslie
20 Ohio St. 161 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1851)