Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports·Decided June 5, 1939·Published

Opinion

OPINION — AG — THERE IS NOT LEGAL INHIBITION AGAINST THE EMPLOYMENT OF THE TEACHER REFERRED TO IN YOUR LETTER (WIFE IS A SISTER OF ONE OF THE MEMBERS OF THE SCHOOL BOARD) BY REASON OF HIS RELATIONSHIP TO THE MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWN OF WAPANUCKA. CITE: OPINION NO. MARCH 9, 1936 — GINDER, OPINION NO. APRIL 23, 1937 — COUNTS, 21 O.S. 481 [21-481] ** NEPOTISM LAWS ** (J. HARRY JOHNSON)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION — AG — THERE IS NOT LEGAL INHIBITION AGAINST THE EMPLOYMENT OF THE TEACHER REFERRED TO IN YOUR LETTER (WIFE IS A SISTER OF ONE OF THE MEMBERS OF THE SCHOOL BOARD) BY REASON OF HIS RELATIONSHIP TO THE MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWN OF WAPANUCKA. CITE: OPINION NO. MARCH 9, 1936 — GINDER, OPINION NO. APRIL 23, 1937 — COUNTS, 21 O.S. 481 [21-481] ** NEPOTISM LAWS ** (J. HARRY JOHNSON)

Opinion No., (Okla. Super. Ct. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion No. (Opinion No.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.