Opinion No. Oag 7-91, (1991)

80 Op. Att'y Gen. 41
CourtWisconsin Attorney General Reports
DecidedApril 10, 1991
StatusPublished

This text of 80 Op. Att'y Gen. 41 (Opinion No. Oag 7-91, (1991)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opinion No. Oag 7-91, (1991), 80 Op. Att'y Gen. 41 (Wis. 1991).

Opinion

JAMES DUVALL, Corporation Counsel Buffalo County

You state that the closest hospital to the Buffalo County Jail is in Wabasha, Minnesota. The closest hospital to southern Buffalo County is in Winona, Minnesota. You ask whether a Wisconsin law enforcement officer may take a prisoner to Minnesota for emergency medical treatment, whether the officer may detain the prisoner when he is in Minnesota and whether the officer may bring the prisoner back into Wisconsin.

In my opinion, a law enforcement officer may take a prisoner out of Wisconsin for emergency medical treatment. However, upon leaving Wisconsin, a law enforcement officer of the receiving state must take custody of the prisoner. In addition, the prisoner may only be returned to Wisconsin using the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act. As is apparent from the discussion that follows, these required procedures present serious practical problems.

A sheriff and his or her deputies have county wide jurisdiction. Secs. 59.23 and 59.24, Stats.; 50 Op. Att'y Gen. 47, 48 (1961). Unless specifically authorized by statute, however, they have no authority outside of their jurisdiction. 1910 Op. Att'y Gen. 373 (1909); McLean v. State of Mississippi, 96 F.2d 741,744-45 (5th Cir. 1938), cert. denied, 305 U.S. 623 (1938). For example, Wisconsin statutes authorize sheriffs to transport criminals through other counties. Sec. 59.25, Stats. Under *Page 42 section 976.04, Stats., the Uniform Act on Close Pursuit, any member of a duly organized state, county or municipal peace unit of another state who enters Wisconsin in close pursuit may arrest the person in this state. Therefore, if neighboring states were signatories to the Uniform Act on Close Pursuit, Wisconsin officers entering those states in close pursuit would have arrest powers. Absent such a law, however, Wisconsin's authority, and the authority of any Wisconsin officer, stops at the state line.

The sheriff must provide appropriate care or treatment for prisoners, and "may transfer the prisoner to a hospital . . . making provision for the security of the prisoner." Sec.302.38(1), Stats.; 77 Op. Att'y Gen. 249 (1988). In a medical emergency, the sheriff should transport the prisoner to a facility that is able to provide the necessary care or treatment in a timely manner. A failure to do so would subject the sheriff to potential liability.

If the sheriff decides to take the prisoner to a medical facility that is not in Wisconsin, the sheriff should proceed under the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, section 976.03. That act is applicable to "any person charged . . . with treason, felony or other crime, who has fled from justice" and is found in another state. Sec. 976.03(2), Stats. The states bordering Wisconsin have adopted the Uniform Act. A person has fled from justice, if "having been in a state when a crime is alleged to have occurred within its borders, and being charged with the offense, is found outside the state." State ex rel. Krueger v.Michalski, 1 Wis.2d 644, 647, 85 N.W.2d 339 (1957). Our supreme court has adopted the general rule that the mode or manner of a person's departure from the state does not affect his status as a fugitive from justice, even if the departure is involuntary or under legal compulsion. State ex rel. Jackson v. Froelich,77 Wis.2d 299, 311, 253 N.W.2d 69 (1977); State ex rel. O'Connor v.Williams, 95 Wis.2d 378, 382, 290 N.W.2d 533 *Page 43 (Ct.App. 1980). The test described by Justice Harlan over eighty years ago is still applicable:

So that the simple inquiry must be whether the person whose surrender is demanded is in fact a fugitive from justice, not whether he consciously fled from justice in order to avoid prosecution for the crime with which he is charged by the demanding state. A person charged by indictment or by affidavit before a magistrate with the commission within a state of a crime covered by its laws, and who, after the date of the commission of such crime, leaves the state, — no matter for what purpose or with what motive, nor under what belief, — becomes, from the time of such leaving, and within the meaning of the Constitution and the laws of the United States, a fugitive from justice. . . .

Appleyard v. Massachusetts, 203 U.S. 222, 227 (1906). The fact that a person has left the state with the knowledge and consent of state officials does not preclude him from being subject to extradition. Chamberlain v. Celeste, 729 F.2d 1071 (6th Cir. 1984).

Under the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act the arrest of a person may be made by an officer or a private citizen without a warrant upon reasonable information that the accused stands charged in the courts of another state with a crime punishable by death or imprisonment for a term exceeding one year. Sec.976.03(14), Stats. Under section 976.03(13), a fugitive may be arrested before requisition, upon a warrant issued by a judge in the other state, even if the crime in Wisconsin is not a felony. Therefore, if the person being brought to Minnesota has been charged with or convicted of a felony, Wisconsin may maintain security over the prisoner through the agency of a Minnesota peace officer even before the extradition process is begun. If the prisoner has been charged with or convicted of a misdemeanor, he or she cannot be arrested without a warrant. Under section976.03(13), however, a judge in Minnesota may issue a warrant *Page 44 directing a Minnesota peace officer to take custody of the prisoner. After an arrest under that subsection, the accused must be taken before a judge with all practicable speed. The judge may then commit the person to local custody in order to provide time for extradition. Sec. 976.03(15), Stats.

When a prisoner is brought to Minnesota for emergency medical treatment, you should proceed under the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, informing the local officials of the prisoner's presence in their jurisdiction and, if appropriate, ask that they arrest him or her without a warrant. In any event, you are required to use the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act to obtain the prisoner's return to Wisconsin.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Appleyard v. Massachusetts
203 U.S. 222 (Supreme Court, 1906)
David Whitney Chamberlain v. Richard F. Celeste
729 F.2d 1071 (Sixth Circuit, 1984)
McLean v. Mississippi Ex Rel. Roy
96 F.2d 741 (Fifth Circuit, 1938)
State Ex Rel. Krueger v. Michalski
85 N.W.2d 339 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1957)
State Ex Rel. Jackson v. Froelich
253 N.W.2d 69 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1977)
State Ex Rel. Niederer v. Cady
240 N.W.2d 626 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1976)
State Ex Rel. O'Connor v. Williams
290 N.W.2d 533 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1980)
Opinion No. Oag 56-88, (1988)
77 Op. Att'y Gen. 249 (Wisconsin Attorney General Reports, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 Op. Att'y Gen. 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-oag-7-91-1991-wisag-1991.