Opinion No. Oag 62-78, (1978)

67 Op. Att'y Gen. 231
CourtWisconsin Attorney General Reports
DecidedAugust 29, 1978
StatusPublished

This text of 67 Op. Att'y Gen. 231 (Opinion No. Oag 62-78, (1978)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opinion No. Oag 62-78, (1978), 67 Op. Att'y Gen. 231 (Wis. 1978).

Opinion

ROBERT P. RUSSELL, Corporation Counsel Milwaukee County

You advise that Milwaukee County has acquired a public transportation system under authority granted in sec. 59.968, Stats., and has created a transit board to operate and maintain the system. The county ordinance provides that three board members are appointed by the county executive and confirmed by the county board. An amendment to the ordinance would provide that one member be a county supervisor to be appointed by the chairman of the county board and confirmed by the county board.

You inquire whether a county board which has created a board to administer a county transit system under powers granted in secs. *Page 232 59.025 (3), (4) and 59.968 (7) (c), Stats., can designate the chairman of the county board as the appointing authority for members of such board.

The language of the cited statutory provisions requires a yes answer.

A second question which must be answered is whether a county board member may be appointed to and serve on such transit board.

I am of the opinion that such member cannot serve on such board and continue to serve as county board supervisor. But, the county board could create a committee composed solely of county board members pursuant to sec. 59.06, Stats., and could, pursuant to sec. 59.025 (3) (c), Stats., transfer all of the duties of the transit board to such committee. The power of appointment would be in the county board chairman without right of confirmation by the county board.

Section 59.968, Stats., provides, in part, that:

"Any county board may:

"***

"(7) Upon the acquisition of a transportation system:

"(c) Delegate responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the system to any appropriate administrative officer, board or commission of the county notwithstanding s. 59.965 or any other section of the statutes."

Section 59.965 (2), Stats., provides, in counties over 500,000, for a county expressway and transportation commission composed of four members appointed by the Governor and one by the county executive. Subsections (1) and (4) of sec. 59.967, Stats., provide that any county may have a transit commission of not less than "7 members to be appointed by the county board . . . except that in any county having a county executive, he shall make said appointments"; and sec. 59.967 (5)(b), Stats., provides, "No transit commissioner shall hold any other public office." In view of the express exception set forth in sec. 59.968 (7)(c), Stats., neither sec. 59.965 (2), Stats., nor subsecs. (1) and (4) of sec. 59.967, Stats., would prevent the county board chairman from being the appointing power or prohibit county board *Page 233 members from serving on the transit board. However, secs. 59.03 (4) and 66.11 (2), Stats., would make county board members ineligible to concurrently serve on the transit board. See 61 Op. Att'y Gen. 424 (1972) and 65 Op. Att'y Gen. 303 (1976).

Subsections (2), (3) and (4) of sec. 59.025, Stats., provide, in material part:

"(2) . . . The powers hereby conferred shall be in addition to all other grants and shall be limited only by express language but shall be subject to the constitution and such enactments of the legislature of statewide concern as shall with uniformity affect every county. In the event of conflict between this section and any other statute, this section to the extent of such conflict shall prevail.

"(3) Creation of offices. Except for the offices of supervisor, judge, county executive and county assessor and those officers elected under section 4 of article VI of the constitution, the county board may:

"(a) Create any county office, department, committee, board, commission, position or employment it deems necessary to administer functions authorized by the legislature.

"(b) Consolidate, abolish or reestablish any county office, department, committee, board, commission, position or employment.

"(c) Transfer some or all functions, duties, responsibilities and privileges of any county office, department, committee, board, commission, position or employment to any other agency including a committee of the board.

"(4) Selection process for offices. The county board may determine the method of selection of any county offices except for the offices of supervisors, judges, county clerk, county treasurer, clerk of courts, county executive and county assessor and those officers elected under section 4 of article VI of the constitution. The method may be by election or by appointment and, if by appointment, the county board shall determine the appointing authority, subject to ss. 59.031 and 59.032."

*Page 234

I am of the opinion that the position of county transit member would constitute an office within the meaning of sec. 59.025 (4), Stats., and that neither the transit board nor a transit board member would constitute a head of department as that term is used in sec. 59.031 (2)(b), Stats.

Section 59.025 (4), Stats., requires that where the method of selection is by appointment, as here, "the county board shall determine the appointing authority, subject to ss. 59.031 and 59.032."

Section 59.031 (2)(c), Stats., which is applicable to counties over 500,000, provides that the county executive shall:

"Appoint the members of all boards and commissions where such appointments are required after August 27, 1959 and where the statutes provide that such appointment shall be made by the county board or the chairman of the county board. All appointments to boards and commissions by the county executive shall be subject to the confirmation of the county board."

The statutes do not expressly provide for a transit board of the type established in Milwaukee County and hence do not provide that such appointment shall be made by the county board or chairman of the board. Appointment by the chairman of the county board is proposed to be authorized by an ordinance of the county board.

Section 59.032 (2)(c), Stats., which is applicable to counties under 500,000, provides that the county executive shall "Appoint the members of all boards and commissions where the law provides that such appointment shall be made by the county board or the chairman of the county board." Section 59.033 (2) (c), Stats., which applies to county administrators in counties under 500,000, uses the "where the statutes provide that such appointment shall be made by the county board or the chairman of the county board" phrase, which is similar to that used in sec. 59.031 (2)(c), Stats

Whereas it can be argued that a county ordinance would constitute a law as that term is used in sec. 59.032 (2)(c), Stats., I am of the opinion that it would not; and I am of the opinion that an ordinance enacted under sec. 59.025 (4), Stats., does not constitute a statute as that term is used in sec. 59.031 (2)(c), Stats. In Werner v. *Page 235 Pioneer Cooperage Co., 155 S.W.2d 319 (Mo. 1941), and Baker v.White, 251 Ky. 691, 65 S.W.2d 1022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baker v. White
65 S.W.2d 1022 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1933)
(1972)
61 Op. Att'y Gen. 424 (Wisconsin Attorney General Reports, 1972)
Opinion No. Oag 101-76, (1976)
65 Op. Att'y Gen. 303 (Wisconsin Attorney General Reports, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 Op. Att'y Gen. 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-oag-62-78-1978-wisag-1978.