Opinion No. Oag 48-88, (1988)
This text of 77 Op. Att'y Gen. 210 (Opinion No. Oag 48-88, (1988)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
RAY A. SUNDET, Corporation Counsel La Crosse County
You ask whether a county possesses the statutory authority to designate the level of ambulance service provided by towns within that county as well as the ambulance service provider that will respond to each medical emergency called into the county dispatch service from such towns.
I am of the opinion that a county lacks statutory authority to designate the level of ambulance service provided by the towns within that county. Absent the existence of a cooperative agreement between a county and a town, I am of the opinion that a county dispatcher possesses considerable discretion to request assistance from the most appropriate and readily available statutorily authorized ambulance provider.
You describe the fact situation which gives rise to your inquiry as follows:
In La Crosse County, there are a number of competing private ambulance services providing emergency care at the basic life support (BLS) level and at the advanced life support (ALS) or paramedic level. Due to the limited number of emergency medical service calls, the competition has been fierce between the private providers resulting in an unstable and chaotic market place. The EMS Board has been attempting to deal with the private ambulance providers in providing the best possible pre-hospital emergency care to the citizens of La Crosse County.
The various town boards have stated through resolutions that they desire a combination of varying BLS providers, while the cities in the County, namely La Crosse and Onalaska, have *Page 211 requested that their citizens be provided with the ALS or paramedic level service.
We have determined that none of the townships in La Crosse County presently contract for, operate or maintain their own ambulance service. However, each township by resolution has requested that La Crosse County through its 9-1-1 dispatch send certain BLS units to its citizens.
Section
A town's statutory authority to provide ambulance services is contained in section
The comments to section
Restates s. 60.29(17) [(1981)], adding authority to purchase equipment for any kind of emergency. While there is some question as to whether provision for ambulance service is mandatory or optional under current law, the special committee concluded that, given the importance of ambulance service, particularly in rural areas, provision of the service should be mandatory. Assembly amendment 4 added the qualification that if ambulance service is provided by another entity, the town need not provide it.
(Emphasis supplied.) The underscored language in the special committee's note clearly indicates that, when ambulance service is provided by another entity such as a county, a town may, at its option, discontinue the service. *Page 212
You point out, however, that section
I find no inconsistency in any of the statutes cited. It is not unusual for counties and municipalities in which they are located to possess concurrent jurisdiction to perform governmental functions. See, e.g., 65 Op. Att'y Gen. 108 (1976); 63 Op. Att'y Gen. 69 (1974). As implicitly indicated in 42 Op. Att'y Gen. 18, such concurrent authority exists with respect to the provision of ambulance services. Thus, pursuant to section
Under the facts as you have stated them, no town in your county is in compliance with section
Since there has been no concurrent provision of ambulance services by the county and any of the towns within your county, I decline to speculate as to whether a dispatcher's discretion would *Page 213 be limited under any particular set of circumstances which has not yet transpired.
DJH:FTC *Page 214
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 Op. Att'y Gen. 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-oag-48-88-1988-wisag-1988.