Opinion No. Oag 40-85, (1985)
This text of 74 Op. Att'y Gen. 206 (Opinion No. Oag 40-85, (1985)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
J. DENIS MORAN, Director State Courts
You ask whether a judge who has served for twenty years, first as a county judge and, since 1978, as a circuit judge, but who was defeated in his last reelection attempt, is eligible for appointment as a reserve judge upon his leaving the bench on August 1, 1985.
Section
(a) Any person who, as of August 1 1978, has served a total of 8 or more years as a supreme court justice or circuit judge; or
(b) Any person who has served 4 or more years as a judge or justice of any court or courts of record and who was not defeated at the most recent time he or she sought reelection to a judicial office.
The judge is not eligible under section
The court system of Wisconsin was reorganized effective August 1, 1978, by creating a court of appeals and by coalescing the county courts and circuit courts. This process culminated in chapter 449, Laws of 1977. Chapter 449, section 491, Laws of 1977, provided that, until the terms of individual county judges expired, each *Page 207 county court was denominated as a circuit court and each county judge denominated as a circuit judge. That section also provided that the courts of the state were altered by making the jurisdiction, powers, duties, functions, rights, benefits and compensation of county courts and county judges identical to the circuit courts and circuit judges.
Chapter 449, section 312, Laws of 1977, created section
Although all county judges became circuit judges on August 1, 1978, nothing in chapter 449, Laws of 1977, or any of the other legislation affecting the court reorganization, makes that designation retroactive. On the contrary, section
The Legislature was certainly aware of the distinction it was making in subsection (a). Subsection (b) does not refer to circuit judges; it merely requires service as a judge of a court of record.
In the absence of ambiguity, it is the duty of the court, and of this office, to give the words of a statute their obvious and ordinary meaning without resort to legislative history, rules of interpretation or canons of construction. Dept. of Transp. v.Transp. Comm.,
BCL:AL *Page 208
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 Op. Att'y Gen. 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-oag-40-85-1985-wisag-1985.