Opinion No. Oag 37-90 (Revised), (1991)

79 Op. Att'y Gen. 201
CourtWisconsin Attorney General Reports
DecidedApril 10, 1991
StatusPublished

This text of 79 Op. Att'y Gen. 201 (Opinion No. Oag 37-90 (Revised), (1991)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opinion No. Oag 37-90 (Revised), (1991), 79 Op. Att'y Gen. 201 (Wis. 1991).

Opinion

WALTER KUNICKI, Chairperson Assembly Organization Committee

The Assembly Organization Committee has requested my opinion concerning the interplay between sections 67.05 and67.12, Stats., and section 120.10 (5) and (5m).

Sections 67.05 and 67.12 concern the means by which Wisconsin school districts can borrow money. Section 67.05 authorizes school districts to issue bonds while section 67.12 authorizes borrowing on promissory notes. In the 1989-90 budget, 1989 Wisconsin Act 31, those sections were amended to affect the procedure for borrowing by school districts in two significant ways. First, the act permitted school districts to borrow up to an aggregate of $1,000,000 upon approval of the school board without any involvement of the electorate. Secs.67.12 (12)(e)2g. and 67.05 (6a)(b), Stats. Second, if the conditions of section 67.05 (6a)(b) are met, the act requires a referendum only in those cases where a sufficient number of electors petition for a referendum. Sec. 67.05 (6a)(b), Stats.

Section 120.10 provides:

The annual meeting of a common or union high school district may:

. . . .

(5) BUILDING SITES. Designate sites for school district buildings and provide for the erection of suitable buildings or for the lease of suitable buildings for a period *Page 202 not exceeding 20 years with annual rentals fixed by the lease.

(5m) REAL ESTATE. Authorize the school board to acquire, by purchase or condemnation under ch. 32, real estate and structures and facilities appurtenant to such real estate necessary for school district purposes.

Where debt is incurred for the acquisition of real estate or the erection of suitable buildings and such borrowing is authorized by a referendum under chapter 67, sections 67.05 (7)(d) and67.12 (12)(e)3. provide that if a referendum is held and the issuance of bonds or temporary borrowing is approved, that referendum also constitutes approval for the express purpose for which the referendum is held. Section 120.10 (5) and (5m) is satisfied by these statutes.

Since 1989 Wisconsin Act 31 does not address the authority for approval of the underlying purposes of borrowing, your first question is: Under what circumstances must a school district independently obtain approval of the electorate through the annual1 meeting for the purpose of borrowing the money if such approval is required by section 120.10 and the school district utilizes section 67.12 (12)(e)2g. or 67.05 (6a)(b) where a referendum is not required or a petition for referendum is not filed under section 67.05 (6a)(b) or 67.12 (12)(e)2.?

Your second and related question is whether the school board of a common school district may provide for the construction of an addition to an existing school building without the approval of the school district electors under section 120.10 (5) or (5m).

The state has delegated its power to accomplish the governmental function of establishing and operating public schools to school districts. In exercising that delegated power the school districts act as state agencies. Buse v. Smith, 74 Wis.2d 550, *Page 203 563, 247 N.W.2d 141 (1976). As state agencies, the school districts "have only such powers as are expressly granted to them or necessarily implied and any power sought to be exercised must be found within the four corners of the statute under which the agency proceeds." Kaiser v. City of Mauston, 99 Wis.2d 345,352, 299 N.W.2d 259 (Ct.App. 1980), quoting from State ex rel.Farrell v. Schubert, 52 Wis.2d 351, 357, 190 N.W.2d 529 (1971).

Section 120.10 enumerates eighteen specific powers given to the electorate of a school district through the annual meeting. Sections 120.12 and 120.13 list the powers and duties of the district school board. Section 120.10 (5) and (5m) gives the annual meeting the power to acquire real estate for buildings through lease or purchase, designate sites for buildings and erect suitable buildings. Section 120.12 (1) provides "[s]ubject to the authority vested in the annual meeting and to the authority and possession specifically given to other school district officers [the school board shall] have the possession, care, control and management of the property and affairs of the school district . . . ."

This division of power between the school board and the annual meeting has characterized the Wisconsin school system from the beginning. State ex rel. Waldeck v. Goedken, 84 Wis.2d 408,415, 267 N.W.2d 362 (1978). Our courts have held that section 120.10 is a grant of a series of powers to school districts "under circumstances which suggest that the grant is exclusive."Waldeck, 84 Wis.2d at 420. Thus, section 120.10 has been "strictly constru[ed] . . . `to preclude the exercise of a power which is not expressly granted.'" Neis v. Educ. Bd. of RandolphSchool, 128 Wis.2d 309, 315, 381 N.W.2d 614 (Ct.App. 1985).

Section 120.12, on the other hand, "empowers the board to exercise `general supervision over [the] schools.'" Waldeck,84 Wis.2d at 415.

School boards, exercising the authority granted in sections67.05 (6a) and 67.12 (12)(e)2g., may incur debt which may occur *Page 204 without authorization of the electorate pursuant to those sections. However, the power to designate sites for school district schoolhouses and for the erection of suitable buildings lies exclusively with the annual meeting. Amendments by implication are not favored.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Farrell v. Schubert
190 N.W.2d 529 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1971)
State Ex Rel. Waldeck v. Goedken
267 N.W.2d 362 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1978)
Kaiser v. City of Mauston
299 N.W.2d 259 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1980)
Buse v. Smith
247 N.W.2d 141 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1976)
Neis v. Board of Education of Randolph School District
381 N.W.2d 614 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 Op. Att'y Gen. 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-oag-37-90-revised-1991-wisag-1991.