Opinion No. Oag 30-84, (1984)

73 Op. Att'y Gen. 99
CourtWisconsin Attorney General Reports
DecidedSeptember 25, 1984
StatusPublished

This text of 73 Op. Att'y Gen. 99 (Opinion No. Oag 30-84, (1984)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opinion No. Oag 30-84, (1984), 73 Op. Att'y Gen. 99 (Wis. 1984).

Opinion

FRANK VOLPINTESTA, Corporation Counsel Kenosha County

You request my opinion with respect to three questions which relate to the terms of office of members of a county veterans service commission appointed pursuant to section 45.12, Stats., a single county section 51.42 board and a county institutions board appointed pursuant to section 46.18(1). You state that Kenosha County has adopted the county executive form of government and that, pursuant to section 59.032(2)(c), appointments to those boards and commissions are "by the county executive" "subject to the confirmation of the county board." You indicate that "[t]erms of office for several boards and commissions in Kenosha County expired December 31, 1983. However, by that expiration date successors to those offices had not been confirmed by the county board. Questions arose concerning the status of the office holders and of the appointed successors."

Section 45.12(1) creates a "County Veteran's Service Commission" in each county to consist of three county residents who are veterans "appointed . . . by the county executive . . . ." Subsection (2) provides that "[t]he county executive . . . after the expiration of the terms of those first appointed shall annually on or before the 2nd Monday in December appoint one person as a member for the term of 3 years." Section 45.14 provides: "Such commission shall meet . . . on or beforethe first Monday of January in each year and at such other times as may be necessary." In my opinion the prescribed or statutoryterm is three years commencing on the first day of January and ending on the last day of December of the third year. As noted hereafter, the personal term of the appointed officer may be longer or shorter than three years depending upon circumstances such as late appointment or confirmation, death, removal and resignation. The statute does not expressly provide that a duly appointed officer holds over until his or her successor is appointed and qualifies.

Section 46.18(1) as amended by 1983 Wisconsin Act 192 provides:

Every county . . . institution . . . [in any county under 500,000] shall (subject to regulations approved by the county board) be managed by a board of trustees, electors of the county, chosen by ballot *Page 101 by the county board. At its annual meeting, the county board shall appoint an uneven number of trustees, from 3 to 9 at the option of the board, for staggered 3-year terms ending the first Monday in January. Any vacancy shall be filled for the unexpired term by the county board; but the county chairman may appoint a trustee to fill the vacancy until the county board acts.

Section 51.42 (4)(b) provides that a county community mental health, mental retardation, alcoholism and drug abuse board shall consist of not less than nine nor more than fifteen persons. Subparagraph (d) provides:

The term of office of any member of the board shall be 3 years, but of the members first appointed, at least one-third shall be appointed for one year; at least one third for 2 years; and the remainder for 3 years. Vacancies shall be filled for the residue of the unexpired term in the manner that original appointments are made.

This opinion assumes, as you have stated, that the term of office begins on January 1 and ends on December 31. Reference should be made to the 1972, 1975 and any other resolutions of the Kenosha County Board of Supervisors which relate to the establishment of the prescribed or regular (stated in years) term. See 65 Op. Att'y Gen. 40 (1976).

Your questions and my answers are:

1. Does an individual appointed or elected to a full term to a board or commission continue to serve beyond his expiration date for a full term and until his successor is qualified.

The answer is yes. None of the offices referred to are elective. Section 46.18 (1) does use the words "chosen by ballot by the county board." Such method is the manner in which the county board exercises its power of appointment. See discussion in 63 Op. Att'y Gen. 286 (1974). The fact that the offices involved are not elective offices is important since section17.03 (intro.) and (10) as amended and created by1983 Wisconsin Act 484 provides that:

Any public office is deemed vacant upon the happening of any of the following events, except as otherwise provided:

. . . .

*Page 102

(10) The expiration of the term of the incumbent if the office is elective.

The Legislature was aware of the importance of shared responsibility, as between the Governor and Senate, as to state offices, and county board chairperson, county administrator or county executive and county board as to county offices and did not wish to upset the balance of authority with respect to temporary or provisional appointments. In 63A Am. Jur. 2d PublicOfficers and Employes §§ 167 and 168 (1984), it is stated:

[167] Apart from any constitutional or statutory regulation on the subject, there seems to be a general rule that an incumbent of an office will hold over after the conclusion of his term until the election and qualification of a successor, and this is true notwithstanding a provision rendering one elected to an office ineligible to succeed himself.

[168] The provision for holding over applies only where a fixed term is annexed to an office. Such a provision may be made applicable to elective as well as appointive officers . . . .

In 63A Am. Jur. 2d Public Officers and Employes § 146 (1984), it is stated:

Where a term of office that is to be filled by gubernatorial appointment, by and with the advice and consent of the senate, has expired, but the incumbent still continues to discharge his duties, there is no vacancy in the office such as will authorize the governor to fill it by appointment of a successor without the consent of the senate.

The Wisconsin court applied these rules where there was express statutory provision for holdover and in the absence of such provision where senate confirmation was required. State ex rel.Thompson v. Gibson, 22 Wis.2d 275, 289-90, 125 N.W.2d 636 (1964).

With respect to the appointive officers within your inquiry it is my opinion that the mere expiration of the regular or prescribed term of one, two or three years does not create a vacancy within the meaning of section 17.03 to which appointment can be made under section 17.22. In my opinion an incumbent holder of such an office who has been duly appointed and confirmed is entitled to hold over until his or her successor is appointed by the county executive and confirmed *Page 103 by the county board. Where original appointments are concerned and there is no express provision that the officer hold over until his or her successor is appointed and qualifies, such officer would have at least de facto status. See 63A Am. Jur. 2d § 595 Public Officers and Employees (1984).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Thompson v. Gibson
125 N.W.2d 636 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1964)
(1974)
63 Op. Att'y Gen. 286 (Wisconsin Attorney General Reports, 1974)
Opinion No. Oag 16-76, (1976)
65 Op. Att'y Gen. 40 (Wisconsin Attorney General Reports, 1976)
State ex rel. Bashford v. Frear
120 N.W. 216 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 Op. Att'y Gen. 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-oag-30-84-1984-wisag-1984.