Opinion No. Oag 12-78, (1978)

67 Op. Att'y Gen. 51
CourtWisconsin Attorney General Reports
DecidedFebruary 17, 1978
StatusPublished

This text of 67 Op. Att'y Gen. 51 (Opinion No. Oag 12-78, (1978)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opinion No. Oag 12-78, (1978), 67 Op. Att'y Gen. 51 (Wis. 1978).

Opinion

ANTHONY S. EARL, Secretary, Department of Natural Resources

You request my opinion whether a member of the Natural Resources Board can at the same time serve as State Director for the Farmers Home Administration.

If there is a bar it would arise, insofar as state law is concerned, from the common-law doctrine of incompatibility of offices or from the eligibility requirement of Wis. Const. art. XIII, sec. 3, which provides in material part:

"No member of congress, nor any person holding any office of profit or trust under the United States (postmasters excepted) . . . shall be eligible to any office of trust, profit or honor in this state."

This section, in doubtful cases, is to be construed liberally in favor of eligibility to office. 16 Op. Att'y Gen. 480 (1927).

In Martin v. Smith, 239 Wis. 314, 326, 1 N.W.2d 163 (1941), it was stated that Wis. Const. art. XIII, sec. 3, does not deal with incompatibility of offices, but rather with eligibility to office, and that its purpose was intended to protect the state in the exercise of its sovereign power. The case further states that the doctrine of incompatibility of offices which renders it improper from consideration of public policy to permit one person to hold two offices, at the same time, where the nature and duties of the same are in conflict, was part of the common law in force in the Territory of Wisconsin at the time of the adoption of the Wisconsin Constitution and continues by reason of Wis. Const. art. XIV, sec. 13. One who *Page 52 accepts an office which is incompatible with the one held, vacates the first.

Whereas the common-law doctrine of incompatibility has generally been applied only where two offices are involved, there is a trend to apply the doctrine to positions if there are many potential conflicts of interest between the two, such as salary negotiations, supervision and control of duties and obligations to the public to exercise independent judgment. Tarpo v. BowmanPublic Sch. Dist. No. 1, 232 N.W.2d 67 (N.D. 1975).

The Farmers Home Administration, created by order of the Secretary of Agriculture, pursuant to authority in congressional act, is part of the Department of Agriculture. See11 Fed. Reg. 9007 (1946), and ch. 964, 60 Stat. 1062 (1946). The FmHA is headed by an administrator who is appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. 7 U.S.C. sec. 1981. In addition to the national office and a finance office located in St. Louis, there are 42 state offices, some of which serve more than one state, and approximately 1750 county offices. See 7 C.F.R. sec. 1800.1 (1977). The FmHA is responsible for administering loan and grant and other assistance programs including, among others: Rural Housing, Farm Operating, Soil and Water, Watershed, Resource Conservation and Development, Comprehensive Area Plans and Water and Waste Disposal. 7 C.F.R. sec. 1800.1.

In view of the programs administered by FmHA there are potential conflicts of interest on the basis of duties which might preclude a DNR Board member from also serving as FmHA State Director, irrespective of whether the latter is an office or a position of employment, as the Department of Natural Resources is engaged in programs involving some of the same important areas.

In Martin v. Smith, supra, p. 332, the court cited the following tests, taken from State ex rel. Barney v. Hawkins,79 Mont. 506, 257 P. 411, 53 A.L.R. 583 (1927), with approval:

"`[T]o constitute a position of public employment a public office of a civil nature, [1] it must be created by the constitution or through legislative act; [2] must possess a delegation of a portion of the sovereign power of government to be exercised for the benefit of the public; [3] must have some permanency and continuity, and not be only temporary or occasional; [4] and its *Page 53 powers and duties must be derived from legislative authority and be performed independently and without the control of a superior power, other than the law, except in case of inferior officers specifically placed under the control of a superior officer or body, and [5] be entered upon by taking an oath and giving an official bond, and [6] be held by virtue of a commission or other written authority."' (Bracketed material supplied.)

The position of Natural Resources Board member is an office of trust, profit or honor in this state as that phrase is used in Wis. Const. art. XIII, sec. 3. See secs. 15.07 (1), (7) and15.34, Stats.

The question which must be resolved is whether the position of FmHA State Director is a federal office of profit or trust rather than a position of mere employment. In my opinion it probably is an office.

The federal courts have placed a very limited interpretation on the term "officer" as that term is used in the Federal Constitution. In 77 Am. Jur. 2d United States secs. 9 and 10, pp. 15 and 16, it is stated:

"As a general rule, an officer of the United States is one who holds his place by virtue of appointment by the President, by one of the courts of justice, or by the heads of departments authorized by law to make such appointment; a person in the service of the government who does not derive his position from one of these sources is not strictly, in the sense of the Constitution, `an officer of the United States,' such phrase usually being taken as having a limited constitutional meaning.

. . .

"***

"[Sec. 10] The distinction between a federal officer and employee does not rest on differences in the qualifications necessary to fill the positions, or in the character of the service to be performed. Whether the incumbent is an officer or an employee is determined by the manner in which Congress has specifically provided for the creation of the several positions, their duties, and appointment thereto. The ordinary criteria may also be resorted to as a means of testing the status of a position, and the court may consider whether the incumbent is with or without tenure, continuing emolument, or continuous *Page 54 duties, and whether he acts only occasionally and temporarily.

"It may here be noted that the term `officer' may be used in an act of Congress in a sense different from that given to it in the Constitution. . . . "

The Farmers Home Administration Act of 1946, ch. 964,60 Stat. 1062 (1946), does not specifically refer to the position of state director; however, it did provide: "That the Administrator of the Farmers Home Administration shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate . . . . The

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tarpo v. Bowman Public School District 1
232 N.W.2d 67 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1975)
State Ex Rel. Barney v. Hawkins
257 P. 411 (Montana Supreme Court, 1927)
Martin v. Smith
1 N.W.2d 163 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 Op. Att'y Gen. 51, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-oag-12-78-1978-wisag-1978.