Opinion No. Oag 10-90, (1990)

79 Op. Att'y Gen. 54
CourtWisconsin Attorney General Reports
DecidedApril 2, 1990
StatusPublished

This text of 79 Op. Att'y Gen. 54 (Opinion No. Oag 10-90, (1990)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opinion No. Oag 10-90, (1990), 79 Op. Att'y Gen. 54 (Wis. 1990).

Opinion

J. DENIS MORAN, Director of State Courts

You have requested my opinion concerning whether a clerk of circuit court is required to docket a large claim money judgment pursuant to section 806.10, Stats., where the $5 docketing fee prescribed in section 814.61 (5)(b) is not paid.

It is my opinion that the statutes have given the clerk discretion to refuse to docket such a judgment where statutory fees have not been prepaid. This discretion is not unlimited; nor does such discretion extend to the performance of all the clerk's duties in conjunction with which he is authorized to collect fees.

One of the statutory duties of the clerk of circuit court is to maintain a judgment record and to docket therein all money judgments. Sec. 59.39 (7), Stats. Section 806.10 (1) provides that the clerk shall enter certain detailed information in the judgment docket at the time of entry of a large claim money judgment. A judgment is entered when it is filed in the office of the clerk of court. Sec. 806.06 (1)(b), Stats. See Bruns v. Muniz, 97 Wis.2d 742,745, 295 N.W.2d 11 (Ct.App. 1980). Section 806.06 (2) provides for the entry of judgment as follows:

(2) The judge or the clerk upon written order of the judge may sign the judgment. The judgment shall be entered by the clerk upon rendition.

A judgment is rendered when it is signed. Sec. 806.06 (1)(a), Stats. *Page 55

Although section 806.06 (2) provides for entry, i.e. filing of a judgment upon rendition, and section 806.10 (1) requires the clerk to docket a judgment at the time of entry, the clerk may refuse to docket the judgment in the absence of prepayment of the statutory fee.

I reach this conclusion for a number of reasons. For more than a century the statutes have provided that the clerk of court may require statutory fees in advance for his services. See Chapter 166, section 2, Laws of 1887. The most recent expression of the Legislature's intent in this regard is the present section 59.42, created by Chapter 317, section 30gw, Laws of 1981:

59.42 Clerk of court; fees; investment of funds. (1) The clerk of the circuit court shall collect the fees prescribed in ss. 814.60 to 814.63. The clerk may refuse to accept any paper for filing or recording until the fee prescribed in subch. II of ch. 814 or any applicable statute is paid.

The supreme court in commenting on identical language in section 59.43, the precursor to section 59.42, noted:

The clerk of court's duties are basically set forth in secs. 59.39 and 59.395, Stats. These duties included the obligation to file all papers properly before him. However, sec. 59.43, supra, provides the clerk may refuse to accept any paper for filing until the appropriate fees are paid. The use of the word "may" in the statute gives the clerk discretion to accept and file papers without the payment of the filing fee. The clerk may "extend credit" but is not obliged to do so and when he does it is at his risk.

Hamilton v. ILHR Department, 56 Wis.2d 673, 681-82,203 N.W.2d 7 (1973) (emphasis in original; footnotes omitted).

In addition, by 1987 Wisconsin Act 151, section 13, the Legislature created section 806.10 (1m), effective March 17, 1988:

806.10 (1m) The clerk's fee for making the entry upon a judgment docket, as prescribed in s. 814.61 (5)(b), shall be paid to the clerk at the time the judgment is docketed.

*Page 56

1987 Wisconsin Act 151 was requested as remedial legislation by your office, and made "minor substantive changes in the statutes." 1987 Wisconsin Act 151, Law Revision Committee Prefatory Note. The specific problem remedied by section 806.10 (1m) was described as follows:

NOTE: Under present s. 814.61 (5)(b), a clerk of court is authorized to collect a fee of $3 for filing and docketing judgments. The statute setting forth the procedure for filing and docketing judgments, s. 806.10, does not reference the filing and docketing fee. Failure to so reference the fee has apparently resulted in confusion and questioning of the clerk's authority to collect the fee.

To prevent future confusion, this bill expressly cross-references s. 806.10 the fee requirement prescribed in s. 814.61 (5)(b).

1987 Wisconsin Act 151, section 13, Law Revision Committee Note.

Section 814.61 provides in relevant part as follows:

814.61 Civil actions; fees of the clerk of court. In a civil action, the clerk of court shall collect the fees provided in this section. . . . The clerk shall collect the following fees:

. . . .

(5) JUDGMENTS, WRITS, EXECUTIONS, LENS, WARRANTS, AWARDS, CERTIFICATES. The clerk shall collect a fee of $5 for the following:

(b) Filing and docketing judgments, transcripts of judgments, liens, warrants and awards, including filing and docketing assignments or satisfactions of judgments, liens or warrants,. . . .

Reading sections 806.10 (1m) and 814.61 (5)(b) together, it is clear that the $5 fee becomes due and owing at the time of docketing the money judgment. It is also clear that the clerk is authorized and in fact has a duty to collect this fee for the service *Page 57 of filing and docketing the judgment. Filing the judgment and docketing it, though two separate activities, are to occur at the same time. Secs. 806.10 (1) and 806.06 (1)(b), Stats.

Although section 806.06 (2) provides that the judgment shall be entered by the clerk upon rendition, the word "shall" is not mandatory in the sense that the clerk must enter judgment immediately upon rendition regardless of nonpayment of the statutory fee. It should be noted that sections 806.06 (1) and (2) remain unchanged from the adoption of the Rules of Civil Procedure, effective January 1, 1976. It is a well-established rule of statutory construction that where statutes by their terms conflict the later statute prevails over the earlier. State ex rel.Mitchell v. Superior Court, 14 Wis.2d 77,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rome v. Betz
355 N.W.2d 844 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1984)
Glinski v. Sheldon
276 N.W.2d 815 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1979)
Karow v. Milwaukee County Civil Service Commission
263 N.W.2d 214 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1978)
Hamilton v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations
203 N.W.2d 7 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1973)
State Ex Rel. Mitchell v. Superior Court of Dane County
109 N.W.2d 522 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1961)
Douglas v. Dewey
433 N.W.2d 243 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1989)
Mosing v. Hagen
148 N.W.2d 93 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1967)
Bruns v. Muniz
295 N.W.2d 11 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1980)
Opinion No. Oag 57-87, (1987)
76 Op. Att'y Gen. 265 (Wisconsin Attorney General Reports, 1987)
Lang v. Menasha Paper Co.
96 N.W. 393 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1903)
Hart v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co.
98 N.W. 526 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1904)
Williams v. Willock
101 N.W. 927 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 Op. Att'y Gen. 54, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-oag-10-90-1990-wisag-1990.