Opinion No. 89-78 (1978)

CourtMissouri Attorney General Reports
DecidedMarch 15, 1978
StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. 89-78 (1978) (Opinion No. 89-78 (1978)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opinion No. 89-78 (1978), (Mo. 1978).

Opinion

Dear Representative Fowler:

This letter is in response to your question asking:

"Is it permissible for a husband and wife to seek elective offices in the same fourth class municipality? One as a member of the Board of Aldermen and one to the Collector's office."

Under Section 79.050, RSMo, aldermen of such a city are elected and the collector of the city may be elected or appointed. That is, if the board of aldermen does not provide for the appointment of a collector, after receiving voter approval, the collector shall be elected.

You have stated that the collector in this instance is elected. We know of no statute which prohibits a husband and a wife from seeking the respective offices of alderman and collector in such a city. The nepotism provision of the Constitution, Section 6, Article VII, in our view is not applicable and does not prohibit a husband and wife from seeking such elective offices.

Very truly yours,

JOHN ASHCROFT Attorney General

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Opinion No. 89-78 (1978), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-89-78-1978-moag-1978.