Opinion No. 83-76 (1976)
This text of Opinion No. 83-76 (1976) (Opinion No. 83-76 (1976)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Honorable Russell Goward Representative, District 65 Room 312, State Capitol Building Jefferson City, Missouri 65101
Dear Representative Goward:
This letter is in response to your opinion request asking whether a prosecuting attorney has authority under Section
Section
". . . When any report is made to the prosecuting attorney of the desertion or nonsupport of a child for whom benefits are claimed, and the whereabouts of the deserting or defaulting parent is known, or can be ascertained, it shall be the duty of the prosecuting attorney to fully investigate all the facts concerning the desertion or nonsupport and institute such action as he deems necessary to secure support for such child. If the prosecuting attorney determines for any reason that an action should not be instituted, a report of his findings and the reason an action was not instituted shall be made to the division of family services. . . ." (Emphasis added)
It seems clear that in enacting the quoted provision the legislature has not in any manner attempted to limit the form of the action the prosecutor might bring. It is thus our view that the prosecuting attorney may, under Section
Yours very truly,
JOHN C. DANFORTH Attorney General
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Opinion No. 83-76 (1976), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-83-76-1976-moag-1976.