Opinion No. , 83-117

CourtOklahoma Attorney General Reports
DecidedFebruary 16, 1984
StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. , 83-117 (Opinion No. , 83-117) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opinion No. , 83-117, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1984).

Opinion

** NURSES — SCHOOLS — MEDICINES — DISPENSE ** (1) A SCHOOL NURSE MAY 'NOT' ADMINISTER NONPRESCRIPTION MEDICATIONS ABSENT A WRITTEN OR VERBAL DIRECTIVE OR ORDER FROM A LICENSED PRACTITIONER OF THE HEALING ARTS. (2) A SCHOOL NURSE MAY, CONSISTENT WITH 59 O.S. 567.3 [59-567.3](2) ADMINISTER A PRESCRIPTION MEDICATION WITHOUT AN ORDER FROM A PHYSICIAN IF SAID MEDICATION IS CONTAINED IN A PRESCRIPTION VIAL WHICH CORRECTLY STATES THE NAME OF THE PATIENT, THE NAME OF THE PRESCRIBER, AND DIRECTIONS FOR ADMINISTRATION OF SAID DRUG. (3) EMPLOYEES OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT, OTHER THAN LICENSED PRACTITIONERS OF THE HEALING ARTS, MAY 'NOT' MAKE A MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS OR ADMINISTER MEDICATIONS. (4) A POLICY ADOPTED BY A LOCAL SCHOOL BOARD OF EDUCATION WHICH WOULD AUTHORIZE A SCHOOL NURSE TO ADMINISTER OR DISPENSE NONPRESCRIPTION MEDICATIONS TO SCHOOL STUDENTS WOULD BE UNAUTHORIZED BY LAW AND IN CONFLICT OF THE MEDICAL PRACTICE ACT, 59 O.S. 401 [59-401] ET SEQ., AND THE NURSING PRACTICE ACT, 59 O.S. 567.3 [59-567.3](2) (SCHOOL BOARD, MEDICINE, DISPENSE, ASPIRIN, EMERGENCY CARE, STUDENTS, MEDICAL TREATMENT) CITE: 10 O.S. 170.1 [10-170.1] 10 O.S. 170.2 [10-170.2], 25 O.S. 2 [25-2], 59 O.S. 353.1 [59-353.1](4), 59 O.S. 353.1 [59-353.1](7), 59 O.S. 353.1 [59-353.1](13), 59 O.S. 401 [59-401], 59 O.S. 492 [59-492], 59 O.S. 567.1 [59-567.1], 59 O.S. 567.3 [59-567.3], 59 O.S. 567.3 [59-567.3](2), 59 O.S. 731.1 [59-731.1](D), 59 O.S. 731.3 [59-731.3] 70 O.S. 1-116 [70-1-116](7), 70 O.S. 3-104 [70-3-104](20) 70 O.S. 5-117 [70-5-117], 70 O.S. 5-117 [70-5-117](2) 70 O.S. 5-117 [70-5-117](15) (CHILDREN) (KAY KAREN KENNEDY) ** SEE OPINION NO. 89-058 (1990) **

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lessee of Nash v. Atherton
10 Ohio St. 163 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1840)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Opinion No. , 83-117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-83-117-oklaag-1984.