Opinion No. , 80-193

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Opinion No. , 80-193

DecidedOctober 16, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. , 80-193 (Opinion No. , 80-193) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Opinion No. , 80-193, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION — AG — (1) 59 O.S. 1971 45.11 [59-45.11](1), 59 O.S. 1971 45.11 [59-45.11](2), AS AMENDED BY HOUSE BILL NO. 1100, ESTABLISHES THE REQUISITE REQUIREMENT TO SIT FOR EXAMINATION AND THE ARCHITECTURAL BOARD IS WITHOUT AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS PRECEDENT WHERE NO SUCH REQUIREMENTS ARE MANDATED BY LAW. (2) EXCEPTION FOR SCHEDULING PURPOSES, SET OUT IN 59 O.S. 1971 45.11 [59-45.11](2), AS AMENDED BY HOUSE BILL NO. 1100, THE ARCHITECTURAL BOARD HAS NO AUTHORITY TO DETERMINE WHEN AN APPLICANT, OTHERWISE QUALIFIED BY LAW, CAN SIT FOR AN EXAMINATION. (REGULATE AND CONTROL AN EXAMINATION) CITE: 59 O.S. 1971 45.8 [59-45.8](B) (RONALD LEE JOHNSON)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION — AG — (1) 59 O.S. 1971 45.11 [59-45.11](1), 59 O.S. 1971 45.11 [59-45.11](2), AS AMENDED BY HOUSE BILL NO. 1100, ESTABLISHES THE REQUISITE REQUIREMENT TO SIT FOR EXAMINATION AND THE ARCHITECTURAL BOARD IS WITHOUT AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS PRECEDENT WHERE NO SUCH REQUIREMENTS ARE MANDATED BY LAW. (2) EXCEPTION FOR SCHEDULING PURPOSES, SET OUT IN 59 O.S. 1971 45.11 [59-45.11](2), AS AMENDED BY HOUSE BILL NO. 1100, THE ARCHITECTURAL BOARD HAS NO AUTHORITY TO DETERMINE WHEN AN APPLICANT, OTHERWISE QUALIFIED BY LAW, CAN SIT FOR AN EXAMINATION. (REGULATE AND CONTROL AN EXAMINATION) CITE: 59 O.S. 1971 45.8 [59-45.8](B) (RONALD LEE JOHNSON)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Opinion No. , 80-193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-80-193-oklaag-1980.