Opinion No. 80-159 (1980) Ag

CourtOklahoma Attorney General Reports
DecidedSeptember 24, 1980
StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. 80-159 (1980) Ag (Opinion No. 80-159 (1980) Ag) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opinion No. 80-159 (1980) Ag, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1980).

Opinion

The Attorney General has received your letter wherein you ask the following question: " May the Department of Corrections, under 57 O.S. 542 [57-542] (1981), require an inmate to pay for the cost of incarceration from funds received from such sources as Veteran's Administration benefits, Social Security benefits, royalty payments and stock dividends, or is the 50% maximum listed in that statute limited to funds paid the inmate for work performed while incarcerated ?" Title 57 O.S. 542 [57-542] (1977), provides: "The State Board of Corrections shall cause to be placed in an account, payable to the inmate upon his discharge, income from that inmate's employment; and from this account the State Board of Corrections shall charge any inmate, except for those inmates employed in state prison industries, for costs of incarceration not to exceed fifty percent (50%) of his wages. Any other income accruing to or payable to said inmate, including any benefits paid by way of workmen's compensation, shall also be deposited in this account. Other withdrawals and deposits shall be made according to rules and regulations established by the Board of Corrections." The Oklahoma Legislature, subject to constitutional restrictions, may authorize the employment of inmates and may provide for the payment of compensation to them. Rice v. State, 108 Okl. 4,232 P. 807 (1924). The wages earned by an inmate through voluntary employment during incarceration have been held to be a mere gratuity which may be withheld or withdrawn at any time. State Board of Charities and Corrections v. Harp, 190 Ky. 147, 227 S.W. 282 (1920). However, any other funds accruing to the inmate such as Social Security benefits, Veteran's Administration benefits, royalty payments, etc., are not wages within the meaning of 57 O.S. 542 [57-542]. It is, therefore, the official opinion of the Attorney General that your question be answered in the negative. Title 57 O.S. 542 [57-542] (1977), does not authorize the Department of Corrections to deduct the costs of incarceration from funds derived by the inmate from such sources as Social Security benefits, Veteran's Administration benefits, royalty payments and stock dividends. Under 57 O.S. 542 [57-542] the Department of Corrections is empowered to deduct an amount, not to exceed fifty percent (50%) from the wages earned by an inmate employed during incarceration for costs of incarceration, except for those inmates employed in state prison industries. (Janet L. Cox)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rice v. State Ex Rel. Short
1924 OK 1112 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1924)
State Board of Charities & Corrections v. Hays
227 S.W. 282 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Opinion No. 80-159 (1980) Ag, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-80-159-1980-ag-oklaag-1980.