Home/Oklahoma Attorney General Reports/Opinion No. 78-228

Opinion No. 78-228

CourtOklahoma Attorney General Reports
DecidedJuly 31, 1978
StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. 78-228 (Opinion No. 78-228) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opinion No. 78-228, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1978).

Opinion

OPINION — AG — THE MULTIPLE AWARD CONTRACT PRESENTLY USED BY THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA IN THE PROCUREMENT OF CERTAIN COMMODITIES IS NOT, AS A MATTER OF LAW, INCONSISTENT WITH THE STATUTES OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. THE CENTRAL PURCHASING DIVISION, STATE BOARD OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, IS CHARGED WITH ADMINISTERING THE PROVISIONS OF THE PURCHASING LAWS AND POLICING THE PROCEDURE. THE ACQUIRING AGENCY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR AWARDING THE CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST AND BEST BIDDER. CITE: 74 O.S. 1971 85.5 [74-85.5], 74 O.S. 1971 85.7 [74-85.7], 74 O.S. 1971 35.5 [74-35.5] (JOSEPH J. REINKE) ** SEE: 857 P.2d 53 (1993), INDIANA NATIONAL BANK V. DH.S. **

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Indiana National Bank v. State Department of Human Services
857 P.2d 53 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Opinion No. 78-228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-78-228-oklaag-1978.