Opinion No. 77-278 (1977) Ag

CourtOklahoma Attorney General Reports
DecidedDecember 5, 1977
StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. 77-278 (1977) Ag (Opinion No. 77-278 (1977) Ag) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opinion No. 77-278 (1977) Ag, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1977).

Opinion

DEFINITIONS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS

The Tulsa Urban League is not a "public body" for purposes of coverage under the Oklahoma Open Meeting Act, 25 O.S. 301 [25-301] — 25 O.S. 314 [25-314] (1977), unless the League were to receive support in whole or in part by public funds or become entrusted with the expending of public funds, or administering public property. The Attorney General has considered your request for an opinion wherein you ask, in effect, the following question: Is the Tulsa Urban League a "public body" for purposes of coverage under the Oklahoma Open Meeting Act? In your request letter you state that the Tulsa Urban League is a non-profit corporation whose funding comes through the United Way and donations. The League, however, serves as the umbrella for various projects whose funding comes through the City of Tulsa, the State of Oklahoma, and the Federal Government. For purposes of coverage under the Oklahoma Open Meeting Act, 25 O.S. 304 [25-304] (1977), defines "public body" as follows: " 'Public body' means the governing body of all municipalities located within the State of Oklahoma, boards of county commissioners of the counties in the State of Oklahoma, boards of public and higher education in the State of Oklahoma and all boards, bureaus, commissions, agencies, trusteeships, authorities, councils, committees, public trusts, task forces or study groups in the State of Oklahoma supported in whole or in part by public funds or entrusted with the expending of public funds, or administering public property, and shall include all committees or subcommittees of any public body." (Emphasis added) From the facts presented, it does not appear that the Tulsa Urban League would be a "public body" within the meaning of 25 O.S. 304 [25-304], quoted above. It is, therefore, the opinion of the Attorney General that your question be answered in the negative as follows. The Tulsa Urban League is not a "public body" for purposes of coverage under the Oklahoma Open Meeting Act, 25 O.S. 301 [25-301] — 25 O.S. 314 [25-314] (1977), unless the League were to receive support in whole or in part by public funds, or become entrusted with the expending of public funds, or administering public property. (GERALD E. WEIS)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Opinion No. 77-278 (1977) Ag, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-77-278-1977-ag-oklaag-1977.