Opinion No. 76-381

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Opinion No. 76-381

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports·Decided February 10, 1977·Published

Opinion

OPINION — AG — ** PHARMACISTS — ADVERTISING OF PRESCRIPTION — DRUGS — SOLICITATION BY MAIL — PRESCRIPTION BY MAIL ** ADVERTISING OF PRESCRIPTION DRUGS IN 'NOT' PROHIBITED, HOWEVER, THE SOLICITATION BY MAIL OF PRESCRIPTION DRUGS IS SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITED BY 59 O.S. 353.24 [59-353.24](D). A PHARMACIST MAY, HOWEVER, FILL AND DELIVER A PRESCRIPTION BY MAIL IF HE IS PERSONALLY ACQUAINTED WITH THE CUSTOMER AND IF THE CIRCUMSTANCES DICTATE THAT SUCH A METHOD OF DELIVERY IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE HEALTH AND WELFARE OF THE CUSTOMER. (MAIL ORDER) CITE: OPINION NO. 76-239, 59 O.S. 736.1 [59-736.1], OPINION NO. 76-103, 63 O.S. 1-1401 [63-1-1401] (PAUL C. DUNCAN)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION — AG — ** PHARMACISTS — ADVERTISING OF PRESCRIPTION — DRUGS — SOLICITATION BY MAIL — PRESCRIPTION BY MAIL ** ADVERTISING OF PRESCRIPTION DRUGS IN 'NOT' PROHIBITED, HOWEVER, THE SOLICITATION BY MAIL OF PRESCRIPTION DRUGS IS SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITED BY 59 O.S. 353.24 [59-353.24](D). A PHARMACIST MAY, HOWEVER, FILL AND DELIVER A PRESCRIPTION BY MAIL IF HE IS PERSONALLY ACQUAINTED WITH THE CUSTOMER AND IF THE CIRCUMSTANCES DICTATE THAT SUCH A METHOD OF DELIVERY IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE HEALTH AND WELFARE OF THE CUSTOMER. (MAIL ORDER) CITE: OPINION NO. 76-239, 59 O.S. 736.1 [59-736.1], OPINION NO. 76-103, 63 O.S. 1-1401 [63-1-1401] (PAUL C. DUNCAN)

Opinion No. 76-381, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion No. 76-381 (Opinion No. 76-381) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.