Opinion No. 76-381

CourtOklahoma Attorney General Reports
DecidedFebruary 10, 1977
StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. 76-381 (Opinion No. 76-381) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opinion No. 76-381, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1977).

Opinion

OPINION — AG — ** PHARMACISTS — ADVERTISING OF PRESCRIPTION — DRUGS — SOLICITATION BY MAIL — PRESCRIPTION BY MAIL ** ADVERTISING OF PRESCRIPTION DRUGS IN 'NOT' PROHIBITED, HOWEVER, THE SOLICITATION BY MAIL OF PRESCRIPTION DRUGS IS SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITED BY 59 O.S. 353.24 [59-353.24](D). A PHARMACIST MAY, HOWEVER, FILL AND DELIVER A PRESCRIPTION BY MAIL IF HE IS PERSONALLY ACQUAINTED WITH THE CUSTOMER AND IF THE CIRCUMSTANCES DICTATE THAT SUCH A METHOD OF DELIVERY IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE HEALTH AND WELFARE OF THE CUSTOMER. (MAIL ORDER) CITE: OPINION NO. 76-239, 59 O.S. 736.1 [59-736.1], OPINION NO. 76-103, 63 O.S. 1-1401 [63-1-1401] (PAUL C. DUNCAN)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Opinion No. 76-381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-76-381-oklaag-1977.