Opinion No. 76-314 (1976) Ag

CourtOklahoma Attorney General Reports
DecidedDecember 6, 1976
StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. 76-314 (1976) Ag (Opinion No. 76-314 (1976) Ag) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opinion No. 76-314 (1976) Ag, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1976).

Opinion

TAXATION — AUTOMOBILE DEALERS — EXCISE TAX ON "DEMONSTRATORS" Where a new car dealer transfers ownership of a new vehicle to another new car dealer, and the said vehicle is used as a "demonstrator" for a period of time and, thereafter, the second dealer sells the vehicle to an individual purchaser, the excise tax should be paid by the individual purchaser of the vehicle. For excise tax purposes, a "demonstrator" under the circumstances as outlined in your first question, should be taxed as a "new vehicle" at the time of its first registration in the State of Oklahoma. The Attorney General has considered your opinion request wherein you ask, in effect, the following two questions: (1) When a new car dealer sells or otherwise transfers legal ownership of an unregistered new vehicle within his inventory to another new car dealer, which other new car dealer uses said vehicle as a demonstrator for a period of time, said vehicle thereby acquiring 10,000 to 15,000 miles as a demonstrator prior to sale to an individual purchaser, is the two percent (2%) new vehicle excise tax due, as provided under 68 O.S. 2103 [68-2103] and 68 O.S. 2104 [68-2104] (1971), upon the transfer of legal ownership or possession between the first and second new car dealer, or, is the applicable excise tax to be paid by the individual purchaser upon purchase from the second new car dealer ? (2) If the subject vehicle has been used as a demonstrator and the individual purchaser is required to pay the excise tax, does the vehicle qualify for "used car" excise tax rates as opposed to "new car" excise tax rates even though the vehicle has not been previously registered? The answer to your first submitted question requires an initial analysis and review of those transactions upon which a motor vehicle excise tax levy is made, this being as provided under 68 O.S. 2103 [68-2103] (1971). 68 O.S. 2103 [68-2103] provides, in pertinent part: "(a) There is hereby levied an excise tax of two (2%) per cent of the value of each motor vehicle, automobile, motorcycle, truck, truck-tractor, trailer, semi-trailer, motor bus, house trailer, industrial tractor and farm tractor, upon the transfer of legal ownership of any such vehicle registered in this State and upon the use of any such vehicle registered for the first time in this State, except as otherwise provided in this Article. The tax hereby levied shall be due at the time of the transfer of legal ownership or first registration in this State of such vehicle, and shall be collected by the Tax Commission at the time of the issuance of a certificate of title for any such vehicle . . . . "(b) The provisions of this Section shall not apply to transfers made without consideration between husband and wife or parent and child." Under 68 O.S. 2103 [68-2103], it is apparent that there are essentially three motor vehicle ownership transfer and use transactions which invoke the application and levy of the two percent (2%) excise tax. These are: (1) The transfer of legal ownership of any vehicle registered in this State, (2) The use of any vehicle registered in this State. and. (3) The use of any vehicle registered for the first time in this State. Applying the transaction facts and circumstances as outlined in your first submitted question to the taxable transactions quoted in 68 O.S. 2103 [68-2103], it would firstly appear that the subject transaction would not fall within the first two noted categories. In this respect, while admittedly the subject transaction would appear to involve the transfer of legal ownership or use of a vehicle, such transaction would not involve a "vehicle registered in this State" as referred to in 68 O.S. 2103 [68-2103], and accordingly, the inter-dealer transaction would not invoke levy of the excise tax under these provisions. As to the third category of excise taxable transactions, i.e., the first registration tax imposition, the applicability of this category to the subject transaction could vary depending upon additional statutory considerations as well as variable facts and circumstances surrounding the transaction. In this regard, the following principles and considerations should be observed. It should firstly be noted that the acquiring dealer may, by his own volition, desire to obtain an original certificate of title to the vehicle acquired from the selling or transferring dealer. Indeed, to accomplish this desire and purpose, the subject vehicle would first have to be registered with the Oklahoma Tax Commission, the same being as required in any consumer purchase of a new motor vehicle. Refer generally to 47 O.S. 22.3 [47-22.3], 47 O.S. 23.3 [47-23.3] [47-23.3] and 47 O.S. 23.6 [47-23.6] (1971). This first registration requirement necessarily invoked in the application for a certificate of title would clearly fall within the third noted excise taxable transaction heretofore referred, and accordingly, the respective excise tax would be levied and due from the purchasing dealer. Relative to circumstances wherein the acquiring dealer does not desire to obtain a certificate of title to the subject vehicle and thereby invoke the first registration excise tax liability, it must next be determined if the acquiring dealer has a legal duty or obligation to make a first registration of the new vehicle so acquired. In this regard, it would appear from a reading and review of the various applicable statutory provisions concerning vehicle registration requirements that the acquiring dealer would not be statutorily obligated to register the subject vehicle. Indeed, the purchase of a new motor vehicle is normally a transaction requiring first registration and application for original certificate of title. Refer to 47 O.S. 22.3 [47-22.3] and 47 O.S. 23.6 [47-23.6] (1971). However, the new car inventory of a licensed new car dealer appears to be generally excepted from such first registration requirements, said exception being by virtue of specific registration and licensing requirements imposed upon such vehicles. Such specific requirements are those basically as provided under 47 O.S. 22.15 [47-22.15](A) (1975). It would appear from the specific registration and licensing requirement imposed by 47 O.S. 22.15 [47-22.15](A) as well as from a related reading and application of 47 O.S. 23.3 [47-23.3] (1971), that a licensed new car dealer's new car inventory is not subject to the first registration requirements normally imposed upon new car purchasers. Such first registration exception would of course not be applicable, under 47 O.S. 22.15 [47-22.15](A) to those new car vehicles acquired by such new car dealer which are used for "a service car, or private use or for hire." Based upon the above-noted statutory provisions, it must be concluded that a new car dealer, in acquiring a new motor vehicle for ultimate sales purposes, would not be required to apply for a first registration of said vehicle as contemplated in 68 O.S. 2103 [68-2103] (1971), and that accordingly, the third category of excise taxable transactions as heretofore noted would likewise not be applicable to the transaction referred to in your first question.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Opinion No. 76-314 (1976) Ag, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-76-314-1976-ag-oklaag-1976.