Opinion No. 76-174 (1976) Ag

CourtOklahoma Attorney General Reports
DecidedAugust 5, 1976
StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. 76-174 (1976) Ag (Opinion No. 76-174 (1976) Ag) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opinion No. 76-174 (1976) Ag, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1976).

Opinion

STUDENT ASSISTANCE AND LOANS — STATE GUARANTEE AGENCY — REGULATION AND TRANSFER OF OBLIGATIONS The laws of the State of Oklahoma do not authorize the State Guarantee Agency to regulate the acquisition of student loans by the Student Loan Marketing Association. Where a lender, participating in the Student Loan Program established pursuant to 70 O.S. 622 [70-622] and 70 O.S. 623 [70-623] (1971), transfers any such student loan to the Student Loan Marketing Association, and such loans carry the guarantee of the State Guarantee Agency, such lender is not relieved of its obligation to make a reasonable collection effort in regard to such loans, and the State Guarantee Agency is not permitted under the laws of the State of Oklahoma to relieve the lender of such obligation. The Attorney General has considered your request for an opinion wherein you ask the following questions relating to the Student Educational Assistance Fund and the Student Loan Program guaranteed by such Fund: "1. Do the laws of the State of Oklahoma permit the State Guarantee Agency to approve an Oklahoma private lender's selling its student loan paper to the Student Loan Marketing Association, an out-of-state institution? "2. In the event a lender sells its loan paper to the Student Loan Marketing Association, is that lender relieved of responsibilities relating to the collection of the loans as set out in the contract with the Guarantee Agency? "3. Is the State Guarantee Agency permitted under laws of the State of Oklahoma to relieve a lender of its contractual responsibility for the servicing and collection of loans for which the paper may have been sold to the Student Loan Marketing Association?" Concerning your first question, 70 O.S. 622 [70-622] (1971) establishes the Student Educational Assistance Fund for the purposes expressed in 70 O.S. 623 [70-623]. The pertinent portion of 70 O.S. 623 [70-623] reads as follows: "The Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education are hereby authorized to utilize a Student Educational Assistance Fund for guaranteeing loans made by private or public lending institutions to students applying for such loan guarantees for the purpose of obtaining financial assistance for attendance at any vocational rehabilitation school, vocational education or trade school, or any institution of higher learning, . . . ". . . "(c) The Regents for Higher Education are further authorized and empowered to promulgate such rules, regulations, and procedures with respect to student eligibility, terms of loans, and other matters they may consider appropriate, as will facilitate the program authorized by this act, and as will not conflict with the terms thereof." The foregoing statutory provisions authorize the State Regents to adopt rules and regulations and procedures in order to carry out the purpose of making student loans available, and to facilitate the Student Loan Program authorized by the act. Thus, any action by the State Regents on this subject would have to carry out the purpose of this act. The student loan paper to which you refer, consists of promissory notes executed by the student as the maker in favor of the lender and such notes are negotiable by their very nature. Nothing contained in 70 O.S. 622 [70-622] or 70 O.S. 623 [70-623] (1971) in any way restricts the negotiability of the promissory notes executed by the student borrowers, or requires approval for their transfer. Thus, approval by the State Regents of the lender selling loan notes to the Student Loan Marketing Association is not authorized by 70 O.S. 622 [70-622] and 70 O.S. 623 [70-623] (1971). Further, since the purchaser of loan paper, the Student Loan Marketing Association, is a federal instrumentality established by 20 U.S.C. § 1087-2 and authorized therein to deal in student loans made under a state Student Loan Program, a State Guarantee Agency would not have authority to regulate its purchases. McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat. (U.S.) 316, 4 L.Ed.2d 579 (1819) and Mayo v. United States, 319 U.S. 441, 98 L.Ed. 1504 (1942). Concerning your second and third questions, the purpose of 70 O.S. 622 [70-622] and 70 O.S. 612 [70-612] (1971) is to have the State Regents act as a State Guarantee Agency in order that private and public lenders will make educational loans to students, and to make available to Oklahoma students the benefits, relating to low interest educational loans, set forth in 20 U.S.C. § 1071 through 1087. The federal administrative regulations implementing the federal law are set forth in 45 CFR, part 177, and provide the terms and conditions under which such state guaranteed loan programs qualify for the federal benefits set forth in the federal law and regulations. Concerning the federally subsidized interest benefit to students, 45 CFR 177.11 reads as follows: "Interest benefits as set forth in Section 177.4 are available with respect to loans insured under state and private nonprofit student loan insurance programs meeting the requirements of Section 177.12 or Section 177.13 and with respect to direct state loan programs meeting the requirements of Section 177.14." Agreements between the United States Commissioner and state guaranteed student loan programs to reduce student interest costs are provided for in 45 CFR, 177.12, the pertinent portion of which reads as follows: ". . . The Commissioner may enter into such an agreement if he determines that the loan insurance program of the guarantee program: . . . (vii) insures not less than eighty percent (80%) of the unpaid principal of loans insured under the programs; . . . (xiii) provides that the student borrower shall not be liable for any portion of the interest on the note which is payable by the Commissioner, and the lender will not collect or attempt to collect such portion of the interest . . . ." Section 177.13 of 45 CFR, referred to in Section 177.11, only has application to student loans which were advanced and insured prior to June 30, 1967, and therefore is not pertinent to consideration of the questions posed. Section 177.31 of 45 CFR deals with agreements for reinsurance and provides in part as follows: " (a) The Commissioner may enter into reinsurance agreements with guarantee agencies with which he has an agreement pursuant to Section 177.12, whereby the Commissioner undertakes to reimburse the agency in an amount equal to eighty percent (80%) of the unpaid principal amount expended by the discharge of its insurance obligations incurred under its loan insurance program, with respect to losses resulting from a default of the student borrower on the unpaid principal balance. . . ." The Student Loan Program established under 70 O.S. 622 [70-622] and 70 O.S. 623 [70-623] (1971), and guaranteed by the State Regents, operates under the foregoing federal regulations for the purpose of making available to Oklahoma students the benefits of 20 U.S.C. § 1071 through 1087. Under the reinsurance provisions, the State retains twenty percent (20%) of the risk, which of course, is funded from the State Educational Assistance Fund created by 70 O.S.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Opinion No. 76-174 (1976) Ag, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-76-174-1976-ag-oklaag-1976.