Opinion No. 75-273 (1975) Ag

CourtOklahoma Attorney General Reports
DecidedNovember 21, 1975
StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. 75-273 (1975) Ag (Opinion No. 75-273 (1975) Ag) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opinion No. 75-273 (1975) Ag, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1975).

Opinion

CONSERVATION DISTRICTS — APPROPRIATIONS The State of Oklahoma may appropriate monies for a public purpose to the Oklahoma Conservation Commission which distributes to the conservation districts funds appropriated for expenditure in connection with the activities of the conservation districts. House Bill No. 1442 of the First Regular Session of the Thirty-fifth Oklahoma Legislature does not permit a home owners association to levy taxes within a conservation district organized under the provisions of the Conservation District Act. House Bill No. 1442 of the First Regular Session of the Thirty-fifth Oklahoma Legislature, codified in the Oklahoma Statutes as Sections 851 through 855 of Title 60, is the only provision of the Oklahoma Statutes applicable to property owners association. The assessment of special taxes are governed by the statutes creating such taxes, which set out the requirement necessary to pass the specific tax created thereby. Subject to the limitations on the use of public funds, the Conservation District Act allows the use of county or state equipment by county or state employees on private property, where the necessary right thereto has been acquired, to carry into effect the purposes of said act. The Attorney General has considered your request for an opinion wherein you ask, in part, the following questions: "1. May the State of Oklahoma appropriate monies to a legally constituted conservation district? (I.E., Interlocal Cooperation Act — 74 O.S. 1001 [74-1001] — 74 O.S. 1008 [74-1008] (1971) passed 1965 — or other pertinent statutes)? "2. Would HB 1442 . . . permit a home owners association to levy taxes within said conservation district to maintain said drainage ditch? "3. What other statutes would apply to maintenance by property owners associations via special taxes for area problems? What majority of owners voting in a special election is required to pass a special proJect tax. "4. May county or state equipment be used by the conservation district employees on private property or by county or state employees provided temporary easement rights have been secured? What is the minimum-maximum time required for easement rights?" Conservation districts are organized under the provisions of the "Conservation District Act" (82 O.S. 1501-101 [82-1501-101] et seq.), which states at Section 1501-501 that: "A district perpetrated by the provisions of this act shall constitute a governmental subdivision of this state, and a public body corporate and politic, exercising public powers." Numbered paragraph 8 of Section 82 O.S. 1501-205 [82-1501-205] sets out the powers and duties of the Conservation Commission, and states in part that the Commission has the duty: "8. To recommend the inclusion in annual and longer term budgets and appropriation legislation of the State of Oklahoma of funds necessary for appropriation by the Legislature to finance the activities of the commission and the conservation districts; to administer the provisions of any act hereafter enacted by the Legislature appropriating funds for expenditure in connection with the activities of conservation districts; to distribute to conservation districts funds, equipment, supplies and services received by the commission for that purpose from any source, subject to such conditions as shall be made applicable thereto in any state or federal statute or local ordinance making available such funds, property or services; . . ." The Conservation Commission has the expressed duty to administer the provisions of acts of the Legislature appropriating funds for expenditure in connection with the activities of the conservation districts, and to distribute to the conservation districts such funds received for that purpose. The intent of the act is that the Legislature appropriate funds to the Conservation Commission, which serves as an agency of the state (82 O.S. 1501-201 [82-1501-201] (1971)), and which distributes such funds to the conservation districts, which are governmental subdivisions of the state (82 O.S. 1501-501 [82-1501-501] (1971)). Such funds are distributed to the several conservation districts to finance their respective activities subject to such conditions made applicable thereto in the appropriation legislation. Therefore the answer to the first part of your first question is that the State of Oklahoma may appropriate monies to the Oklahoma Conservation Commission which has the duty to distribute to conservation districts funds appropriated for expenditure in connection with the activities of the conservation districts. In response to the second part of your first question, a conservation district and the Interlocal Cooperation Act are not one and the same. The purpose of the Interlocal Cooperation Act (74 O.S. 1001 [74-1001] through 74 O.S. 1008 [74-1008])is to authorize cooperation and joint exercise of powers, privileges, or authority among the various governmental entities. Rollow v. West, Okl.,479 P.2d 962 (1971). Section 1007 of the act allows any public agency entering into an agreement pursuant to the act to appropriate funds to the entity created to operate the joint or cooperative undertaking. There is no direct relationship between a conservation district organized under the provisions of the Conservation District Act, and the Interlocal Cooperation Act. The former specifically creates a governmental entity while the latter authorizes cooperation or joint exercise of powers between governmental entities. House Bill No. 1442 of the First Regular Session of the Thirty-fifth Oklahoma Legislature, codified in the Oklahoma Statutes as Sections 851 through 855 of Title 60, is entitled in part: "An act relating to property; . . . providing for powers of owner's association; providing for assessment of taxes on property; . . .", and purports to give such owners association the power to impose "taxes, special assessments, and other charges" against the owners of real property in the real estate development wherein such association is formed. In Application of Erick Hospital District, Okl., 444 P.2d 216, 218 (1968), the Court stated: . "Because of the prohibition contained in Article X, Section 9 of the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma, before and after the amendment thereto in 1965, taxes on an ad valorem basis can be levied only for the purposes of the subdivision of the state which are listed therein — counties, cities, towns, and school districts, under the 1965 amendment of that section -. . ." The Court distinguished assessments from general taxes, stating that the former are authorized by of Article X, Section 7 of the Oklahoma Constitution, which provides that: "The Legislature may authorize county and municipal corporations to levy and collect assessments for local improvements upon property benefitted thereby . . . without regard to a cash valuation." Since an "owner's association", such as provided for in the aforesaid act, clearly is not a county, city, town, municipal corporation, or school district, within the contemplation of Sections 7 and 9 of Article X of the Oklahoma Constitution, the levying of any taxes or special assessments by such an association is prohibited by those Sections of the Constitution. Because an owners association organized under the provisions of House Bill No.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. State
1963 OK CR 48 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1963)
Application of Erick Hospital District
1968 OK 112 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1968)
United States v. HOME FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASS'N OF TULSA
418 P.2d 319 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1966)
Herndon v. Anderson
1933 OK 490 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1933)
Rollow v. West
1971 OK 3 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Opinion No. 75-273 (1975) Ag, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-75-273-1975-ag-oklaag-1975.