Opinion No. 75-108 (1975) Ag

CourtOklahoma Attorney General Reports
DecidedFebruary 14, 1975
StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. 75-108 (1975) Ag (Opinion No. 75-108 (1975) Ag) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opinion No. 75-108 (1975) Ag, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1975).

Opinion

QUORUM — COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS Two members of the three member Council on Judicial Complaints constitute a quorum for the purpose of conducting official business. This is to acknowledge receipt of your letter wherein you ask: "May two (2) members of the three (3) — member Council on Judicial Complaints, 20 O.S. 1651 [20-1651] (1974) et seq., constitute a quorum for the purpose of conducting official business?" The Act creating the Council on Judicial Complaints (20 O.S. 1651 [20-1651] — 20 O.S. 1661 [20-1661] (1974)) does not set out specifically what constitutes a quorum of this particular Council. Thus, it is necessary to go to 25 O.S. 31 [25-31] (1971), which states: "Words giving a joint authority to three or more public officers or other persons, are construed as giving such authority to a majority of them, unless it is otherwise expressed in the act giving the authority." Based upon 25 O.S. 31 [25-31] (1971), two members of the three member council constitute a quorum. It is, therefore, the opinion of the Attorney General that your question be answered in the affirmative in that two members of the three-member Council on Judicial Complaints constitute a quorum for the purpose of conducting official business. (Todd Markum)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Opinion No. 75-108 (1975) Ag, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-75-108-1975-ag-oklaag-1975.