Opinion No. 73-225 (1973) Ag

CourtOklahoma Attorney General Reports
DecidedAugust 22, 1973
StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. 73-225 (1973) Ag (Opinion No. 73-225 (1973) Ag) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opinion No. 73-225 (1973) Ag, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1973).

Opinion

SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION — FINANCING RECREATIONAL VEHICLE

A recreational vehicle used or designed for use as living quarters is eligible for financing from a Savings and Loan Association. This is to acknowledge receipt of your letter wherein you ask, in effect, whether or not a savings and loan association can make a loan on recreational vehicles. Title 18 O.S. 381.57 [18-381.57] (1971) sets out the various areas in which loans may be made by Savings and Loan Associations. Subsection 6, relating to mobile homes, states: "Loans made for the purpose of mobile home financing. For the purpose of this subsection 'mobile home' shall mean a movable accommodation with its equipment and furnishings, used or designed for use as living quarters." "Mobile homes" has a specific definition for the purpose of the Savings and Loan Act, and the basic requisite is that it be used or designed for use as living quarters. Thus, if the recreational vehicles are used or designed for use as living quarters, the owners thereof will be eligible for loans from Savings and Loan Associations. It is, therefore, the opinion of the Attorney General that your question be answered as follows: A recreational vehicle used or designed for use as living quarters is eligible for financing from a Savings and Loan Association. (Todd Markum)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Opinion No. 73-225 (1973) Ag, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-73-225-1973-ag-oklaag-1973.