Opinion No. 71-427 (1972) Ag

CourtOklahoma Attorney General Reports
DecidedFebruary 21, 1972
StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. 71-427 (1972) Ag (Opinion No. 71-427 (1972) Ag) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opinion No. 71-427 (1972) Ag, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1972).

Opinion

STATE COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL RELOCATION ACT Urban renewal authorities, public school districts, counties and municipalities are able to comply with federal law in regard to relocation assistance and real property acquisition policies. The Attorney General has considered your letter wherein you ask the following question: "Under the various provisions of Oklahoma law are Oklahoma Urban Renewal Authorities, Public School Districts, Counties, and Municipalities able to comply with the provisions of Public Law 91-646, 84 Stat. 1894, entitled, 'Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970,' which was enacted by the United States Congress on January 2, 1971." A general reading of the federal statute would seem to indicate that it applies only to federal agencies. However, upon a close examination of two crucial sections of the federal act (210 and 305 which are hereinafter discussed) certain obligations are imposed upon a state as a condition precedent to that state's receipt of federal assistance for public projects involving acquisition of land and the relocation of persons thereon. In short, the states are required to adopt legislation in compliance with the federal act by July 1, 1972, or face the loss of federal assistance on projects involving land acquisition and the displacement of persons. To comply with Title II of the federal act the Oklahoma Legislature enacted Senate Bill 298 which is now codified as Title 63 O.S. 1085 [63-1085] — 63 O.S. 1099 [63-1099] (1971), and was effective July 1, 1971. To comply with Title III of the federal act, the Oklahoma Legislature enacted House Bill 1479, which is codified as Title 27 O.S. 9 [27-9] — 27 O.S. 15 [27-15] (1971) and which is to be effective July 1, 1972. The federal and state acts are largely similar in provisions. An initial example would be the respective declaration of purpose of the federal and state act provisions dealing with relocation assistance. Section 201 of Title II states the declaration of policy for the Federal Relocation Assistance Act: "The purpose of this title is to establish a uniform policy for the fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced as a result of Federal and federally assisted programs in order that such persons shall not suffer disproportionate injuries as a result of programs designed for the benefit of the public as a whole." Title 63 O.S. 1085 [63-1085] (1971), provides: "The purpose of this act is to establish a uniform policy for the fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced by the acquisition of real property by any public project receiving Federal financial assistance in any part thereof. Whenever the words 'federally assisted' appear in this act, same shall be construed as pertaining to any public program or project receiving Federal financial assistance in any part thereof. Such policy shall be uniform as to (1) relocation payments, (2) advisory assistance, (3) assurance of availability of standard housing." Thus it can be seen that the declaration of purpose for both the Federal and State acts are very similar. The states are required to comply with the provisions of 210 and 305 of the federal act, in order to qualify for federal assistance. Title II, 210 of the Federal Act provides: "Notwithstanding any other law, the head of a Federal agency shall not approve any grant to, or contract or agreement with, a State agency, under which Federal financial assistance will be available to pay all or part of the cost of any program or project which will result in the displacement of any person on or after the effective date of this title, unless he receives satisfactory assurances from such State agency that "(1) Fair and reasonable relocation payments and assistance shall be provided to or for displaced persons, as are required to be provided by a Federal agency under Sections 202, 209, and 204 of this title "(2) Relocation assistance programs offering the services described in Section 205 shall be provided to such displaced persons; "(3) Within a reasonable period of time prior to displacement, decent, safe, and sanitary replacement dwellings will be available to displaced persons in accordance with Section 205(c)." (Emphasis added) Title II, 305 of the Federal Act provides: "Sec. 305. Notwithstanding any other law, the head of a Federal agency shall not approve any program or project or any grant to, or contract or agreement with, a State agency under which Federal financial assistance will be available to pay all or part of the cost of any program or project which will result in the acquisition of real property on and after the effective date of this title, unless he received satisfactory assurances from such State agency that; "(1) in acquiring real property it will be guided, to the greatest extent practicable under State law, by the land acquisition policies in section 301 and the provisions of section 202, and "(2) property owners will be paid or reimbursed for necessary expenses as specified in sections 301 and 304." (Emphasis added) Thus, it can be seen that in order to comply with Section 210 of the Federal Act, and thereby be eligible for federal assistance, the various states are required to adopt statutes in compliance with Sections 202, 203, 204, Section 205 and Section 205(c) (3) of the Federal Act. To comply with Section 305 of the Federal Act, the states are required to adopt legislation in compliance with Sections 301, 302, 303 and 304 of the Federal Act. A comparative reading of Title II, Section 202 of the Federal Act and 63 O.S. 1087 [63-1087] (1971), reveals that they are virtually identical in provisions, and that the state law fully complies with the federal law. The same is true for Title II, Section 203 and 63 O.S. 1088 [63-1088] (1971). In addition, the provisions of Title II, Section 204 and 63 O.S. 1089 [63-1089] (1971), are identical. Hence, the preceding sections of the state law are clearly in full compliance with the Federal Act. The provisions of Title II, Section 205 of the Federal Act and 63 O.S. 1090 [63-1090] (1971), are not identical but there is substantial compliance with the federal law. The Federal Act provides: "(a) Whenever the acquisition of real property for a program or project undertaken by a Federal agency in any State will result in the displacement of any person on or after the effective date of this section, the head of such agency shall provide a relocation assistance advisory program for displaced persons which shall offer the services described in subsection (c) of this section. If such agency head determines that any person occupying property immediately adjacent to the real property acquired is caused substantial economic injury because of the acquisition, he may offer such person relocation advisory services under such program. "(b) Federal agencies administering programs which may be of assistance to displaced persons covered by this Act shall cooperate to the maximum extent feasible with the Federal or State Agency causing the displacement to assure that such displaced persons receive the maximum assistance available to them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Opinion No. 71-427 (1972) Ag, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-71-427-1972-ag-oklaag-1972.